On July 19th, 2021, You made an Order to Dismiss Case file CV-21-86803 under Rule 2.01.1 by accepting private pleadings from defense counsel in violation of Rule 1.09, and interfering with the plaintiff’s opportunity for a fair and impartial hearing. Defense counsel provided You with false, impartial testimony which led You to provide an endorsement containing over 23 (twenty-three) counts of fraud, perjury and libelous, defamatory statements regarding My Character. Fraud and perjury are not admissible on a Court of Record, and are an abdication of the judicial duties of Your Office.
I filed a Motion with the Court to Vacate Your Order and to suspend You from further adjudication over Case file CV-21-86803 for conflict of interest. The Courts have failed to respond to this Motion as of the date this Notice of Criminal Liability is served upon You, Friday, August 13th.
My intention was to empower the Courts to absolve You of Your crimes because I knew Your determination was unfairly influenced by the false and impartial testimony provided to You by defense counsel, and Vacating the Order removes all Your slanderous libel and defamatory statements regarding My Character from the Court of Record, and allows You to continue holding Your position of Office in Honour. I can only presume the Courts are as every bit as displeased with Your collusion and determination to prevent Me from a fair hearing, and/or provide any relief for the trespasses upon My inherent rights which were further compounded by Your determination and further trespass. So, as of today, Your crimes remain clearly evident on this International Court of Record, and You are hereby charged with fraud, perjury, defamation of [My] Character, and abdication of Your duties as an Officer of the Court and a violation of Your Oath of Office to Her Majesty as a Crown representative.
You also make a total of at least twenty-three false statements defaming My Character and further trespass upon My inherent right of Self determination. By dismissing this Action, You are interfering with My right to relief and remedy for the violations of My inherent rights by state actors (city employees), and abdicating Your duties as an Officer of the Court. You do not have any ‘right’ to ignore Your obligation to provide relief and remedy for My inherent rights violations under international law, and You most certainly do not have the right to violate My inherent rights Your Self. The Superior Courts of Ontario must be of concurrent, competent jurisdiction to provide relief and remedy for international rights violations under Provision 24(1) (Relief and Remedy Charter violations). By failing to provide relief and remedy for My inherent rights while acknowledging that defense counsel ‘…show Willful disregard for their legal obligations, continually trespassing upon Sean’s right of Self determination, and his right to freely dispose of his natural wealth without prejudice to foreign obligations,’.
And yet You say this is not a justiciable claim. That is only True if You are abandoning Your duties and obligations as an Officer of the Court to provide relief and remedy for violations of My inherent rights. You are also Willfully violating My right of Self determination in Your endorsement, and a trespass upon a right is a form of harm/tort, and a breach of Your international obligations as an Officer of the Crown’s Courts. International law is superior in jurisdiction and authority to the Rules of Civil Procedure. Civil Procedure is not Law and [Rule 2.01.1] may not be used as an excuse to abdicate Your legally binding obligations to the UNCCPR, and/or Your duty to provide relief and remedy for trespasses upon those rights. Shall means must in law.
Similar or related provisions are found in the following international instruments binding on Canada: article 2(3) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
3. Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes:
(a) To ensure that any person whose rights or freedoms as herein recognized are violated shall have an effective remedy, notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity;
(b) To ensure that any person claiming such a remedy shall have his right thereto determined by competent judicial, administrative or legislative authorities, or by any other competent authority provided for by the legal system of the State, and to develop the possibilities of judicial remedy;
1. All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.
2. All peoples may, for their own ends, freely dispose of their natural wealth and resources without prejudice to any obligations arising out of international economic co-operation, based upon the principle of mutual benefit, and international law. In no case may a people be deprived of its own means of subsistence.
3. The States Parties to the present Covenant, including those having responsibility for the administration of Non-Self-Governing and Trust Territories, shall promote the realization of the right of self-determination, and shall respect that right, in conformity with the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations.
You can find the review of Your determination which itemizes the number of times You commit fraud and perjury assassinating the Good nature of My Character on the Court of Record here.
I find it most ironic that as a Justice, surely You know You can fine or jail a Man for contempt for failing to address You by Your proper legal title in a Court of Law, but You suggest I am not able to fine state actors for violating My inherent rights legally binding upon all of Canada and their agents? I most certainly can and I am thing King $100,000.00 per offense is appropriate because the city does not Wish to pay it, which suggests it Will be an effective deterrent to future violations. I am doing the same with You, and I am holding You liable for the claim amount against the defendants for dismissing a Case that does not qualify for Rule 2.01.1 in any case (even with defense counsel’s impartial, misleading testimony). It does not qualify because Your legally binding international obligations are superior in both jurisdiction and authority to the Rules of Civil Procedure.
You are liable to Me for a total amount of $2,510,800.00 (two million, five hundred and ten thousand, eight hundred dollars). You are also a state actor and therefor also subject to international law and fines for violations of My inherent rights.
You have 30 (thirty) days from the day of this Notice (August 13th, 2021) to Vacate the Order and recuse Your Self from Case file CV-21-86803. If You fail to Vacate the Order and leave these criminal Acts of fraud on the International Court of Record, a Claim Will be made against Your bond for the full $2,510,800.00 You are liable to Me for. (Libel=liable)
A copy of My Order to the Court to Vacate is Posted below. Print, Sign, and file with the Court and this Notice Will be removed from the International Notices as soon as I receive confirmation it is done. You Will be also be removed from the list of government representatives God is Officially displeased with.
I don’t hold grudges, I presumed this was a mistake. But I am not going to tolerate You defaming My character and violating international law by Way of further violations of My inherent rights just because You are a Court Justice. You are not above the law, You are supposed to be an example of Law. This determination is an abomination on both the Courts of Justice and the Crown.
Ms. Sally A. Gomery, You are hereby served.