SECOND and FINAL Notice of Liability for Breach of Trust, Aggravated Circumstances

I’ll be tall King about this more tonight in the Free Lance Friday Edition, but to summarize, this SECOND Notice of Civil and Criminal Liability was actually in response to an email reply sent by Krystal Skof. It IS included in the attachment of the Second Notice so that the Social Benefits Tribunal can see the reply, but I’m going to share it here so that You can see for Your Self what Krystal Skov was trying to do.

Of course, this infuriated Me, initially. The only thing that stopped the inferno raging inside Me from spewing some kind of volcanic erupt-Sean in reply, was the fact that this email is so suicidal. The email does not address a single Word I’ve complained about from Our meeting Wednesday, no apology or compassion for the harm they’ve done to Me. The only intent behind this email was to intimidate and gaslight the legal arguments that CAUSED them to be on Notice in the first place, simultaneously breaching the very same Trust!!!

I couldn’t believe that this was their reply before the Social Benefits Tribunal. Really?! After everything that has transpired and the situate-Sean they are in, THIS is how they believe the Social Benefits Tribunal Will expect them to reply? It’s nothing but contempt of Court and further trespass, more evidence of the very crimes they are answering to before the Tribunal.

But no, they’re NOT actually that stupid!!! They didn’t Wish for the Social Benefits Tribunal to see that reply, Krystal didn’t send it to the Social Benefits Tribunal, she sent it to Me, Lili Mukalay, and Nana Asante – the ones most liable for the events on (Lucky) Wednesday, and most importantly, conveniently omit the SBT from their reply – because it isn’t one that would be suitable in response to the Notice of Criminal and Civil Liability, it would just be contempt of Court.

So as soon as I found out that the SBT wasn’t sent the reply, I made the whole email thread of the original Notice into a pdf and added as an attachment to the SECOND Notice. Now I’m adding evidence of contempt to the previous Notice of Liability – not Good, People!

But it gets even more interesting than that! Shortly after that (I don’t know, maybe an hour or two at most), a courier arrived at My door with ‘the City’s response to My Claim with the SBT!!!

I’ll run too long if I get into this now, check out the Free Lance Friday Edition later tonight to get the full Story in the Good News Journal.

Point is, it is LONG after 5:00 PM now, and this is the first ‘DEFAULT JUDGMENT, RES JUDICATA’ I Will be serving on parties before a Court. I even followed up to remind every One that if they don’t reply before 5:00 PM, a Notice of Default allows Me to communicate with the Court directly and without their knowledge or consent, ‘ex-parte’.

This is ‘due process’ before the Social Benefits Tribunal. I haven’t ‘officially’ consented to communicate Sean by Way of email (hence the courier showing up at My door) but My Default Judgment Will be no less legally and lawfully binding. It appears I just won a $100 million claim! Not so hard, right? Only took six years…