Volume CCXCII: The Thoroughly Thrilling Thing King Edition; Criminal Cox Complaining to the Court

Hello every One and welcome to the Thursday Thing King Edition, thank King or Queen You for being here, We are the moral Highness of Our House. Today is a Thoroughly Thrilling Thursday in Deeds, and I Will be tall King about ‘King’ things, so it is also appropriate for the ‘Thing-King’ (thinking) Edition, too! Because the Microcosm reflects the Macrocosm in all things, My Friends are God’s window into Man’s Macrocosm. The things the Friends in My Microcosm are as King of Me about are probably the very same things most of Man’s Macrocosm Will Wish to know, too. Today in particular, I Will be tall King about what I told My Friends who were as King of Me,

“So, how does a King respond to something like this? What do You do now?”.

If You don’t already know, We are tall King about Agent Smith in Man’s Matrix, and quite literally and more precisely, Judge Marc E. Smith of the Ontario Superior Court and the Decision he made yesterday regarding The Kingdom of Heaven Found a Sean’s Trust Claim. That’s also why I’m using the same featured Image (I-Mage) as yesterday because it partially answers the Quest-Ion.

Don’t get Me wrong, I was initially as infuriated by the decision as any One else would be. The entire premise of opposing counsel’s testimony is that due process was had in a CAET application, and that she was duly appointed as the Estate Trustee for Joachim von Dehn’s Estate. But there is no Record of this Appointment with any Superior Court in the province of Ontario, and $3 million in Claims waiting to proceed against the Estate, Showing My father as ‘UNREPRESENTED’. So the Real world tells a different Story than the Fantasy fiction tale Agent Smith was told by opposing counsel.

However, this is why I also suggested yesterday that this decision could be as deliberate as I now believe genius Jester of a Justice, Jaye Hooper’s decision was. I believe that Justice Hooper made the incorrect decision deliberately because she makes absolutely ridiculous and outrageous statements in the decision. So outrageous that any lawyer reading the decision Will know it Will be overturned in a heartbeat if it were ever appealed, and the Judge would look like an idiot. Having a decision overturned by a ‘higher’ Court is a Judge’s worst nightmare because it means they made the wrong decision – and almost always because the Court failed to inherit the Jurisdiction necessary to provide relief and remedy to the Claimant.

Wish for an example? How about I Gift You with one that was used by both Judge Hooper and Smith?

“There is no legislation to provide for Trusts”

both Judge Hooper and Smith, paraphrasing

Seriously? It’s such an obvious attempt to gaslight a Self Presented litigant, the Judge would be ridiculed for trying to tell that to a Trust lawyer, and it most certainly would not stand on appeal. That detail alone is sufficient to vacate the Order because it is a statement of fraud – Trust Law in Ontario is clearly and explicitly legislated by the Trustee Act of Ontario. How embarassing would it be if a Judge tried to say they didn’t know that? It wouldn’t be believable, the Court would presume collusion and corruption on the part of the Judge absolutely.

So the only thing One really can do, is laugh and start thing King about the virtually endless possibilities. The fraud is obvious and clear, and the Court of Record Will eventually need to appoint some One to address the insurance claims, or (more likely), the Claimants already know these People are engaged in fraud, colluding with the bank to hide assets, and just waiting to see what happens. I’ve Given Notice of Appearance to the Claimants, the Truth Will eventually come out and their crimes Will be exposed.

The only difference now, is that the fraud is that much greater, one more Court judge unfairly influenced by fraudulent testimony, tarnishing the repute a Sean of the Crown on this International Public a Sean.

However, there are some things One can do if a decision is made that was unfairly influenced by fraudulent testimony (specifically). One must (moral and ethical obligation) report the fraud to the Court if One has first hand knowledge of the fraud, otherwise it sets precedence for case law that Will have been established in fraud! This is why it is important to appeal every incorrect decision because if One doesn’t, it stands to set other incorrect precedence for the future.

So I advise Brian Suzuki, the Agent (service of documents) for Judge Smith that the decision is unacceptable as the testimony his decision relies on is fraud, the Court of Record shows that no One has been Appointed as the Trustee for Joachim von Dehn and there are $3 million in insurance claims waiting to proceed when some One is. I include a screenshot of the claims waiting to proceed showing My father ‘unrepresented’ and advise Henry that the decision is Vacated for fraud.

That was yesterday. Last night I had some additional time to be thing King about it because of course, soon opposing counsel Will Wish to compel Me to accept the Judge’s Order obtained in fraud. I Will not, of course, but it won’t stop them from as King.

So I figured I should also remind the Judge of the Notices of Civil and Criminal Liability that were duly served on opposing counsel (and with the Ottawa Superior Court as My witness) and advise that they Will be Noted in Default if there is no response to My email before 5:00 PM today, and I Will be as King for the Registrar to enforce the Default Judgement awarded against them. It reads as follows…

That was sent at 8:37 this morning. But Christopher Crisman-Cox had some other corrections he Wished to have amended in the decision, so I decided to take advantage of an email thread that Shows that Henry is forwarding these requisitions to the Judge. It would not be reasonable to presume he Will do this for one party and not the other, so here I can Show that My emails are being received. If the Judge does not oppose My non-acceptance for fraud, it is presumed to be ‘unopposed’. That is a FACT in Law, much as opposing counsel Wish to attempt to gaslight this fact.

But of course, as I mentioned yesterday, the only Ones who Will complain about a Recording are criminal Cox trying to perpetrate fraud on a Court to hide Estate assets from $3 million in insurance claims. Right?! So of course Christopher complains and once again Henry Suzuki confirms he Will pass the information on to the Judge. Now that We have further confirmation that Henry is making sure the Judge receives My objections to his unacceptable decision, I advise him in the same thread to also remind the Judge that Christopher Crisman-Cox and the rest of the criminal cabal are guilty of fraud with intent to hide estate assets from insurance claims. I’m even as King of the Judge if he Wishes for Me to let the creditors know how the Judge has determined the remainder funds should be divided without updating the registry with Mrs. Johnson’s appointment or taking the $3 million in claims into consider a Sean at all. Almost looks like the Judge is helping My sister and brother collude with the bank to hide estate assets from these creditors, doesn’t it? That can’t be a Good look, Agent Smith!!!

However, the complaint was sent to the Judge at 11:00 this morning and there no reply all day. Now, it’s possible they Will try and arrest Me, but I wouldn’t bet on it. And if they DO!!!… Well, that Will only exponentially increase the Value of the Claim and the harm done to Me by the Court’s criminal negligence.

Not quite the top of the charts yet, but no threats received so far. 😉

Please, enjoy ‘Neo Verses Smith’.

Love and Blessings,