Hello every One and welcome to the Magical Monday Motive a Sean Edition, thank King or Queen You for joining Me, Your Presence is always a welcome Gift in My House. Today is a Motive a Sean all Monday for Me because We are still waiting to see what the Ottawa Courthouse and Judge ‘Agent’ Smith Will have to say about the fraud opposing counsel have perpetrated on the Court in My most recent Motion hearing (if anything). It’s been two full days so far since opposing counsel was noted in ‘Defaul Judgment, Nihil Dicit, Res Judicata‘ for their fraud (with the preceeding notices showing due process of service on all parties and the Court attached to the email), and no Word yet! That’s curious, in Deed. I followed up on that today and have that to share with You, and We also finally received Word from the Social Benefits Tribunal, and that’s the Micro-Magical Victory I Will be tall King about today!
Before We get to the Micro-Magical Victory in My Microcosm this Monday, let’s first take a look at the email that was the Motive a Sean behind this Mystical Monday.
Again, opposing counsel and most of their co-conspirators were Noted in Default Judgement, Nihil Dicit, Res Judicata early Monday morning (just after the Court officially opens). It’s been two full business days now, no response from the Court. No response means no protest.
It is also important to keep in Mind that there is nothing to say (Nihil Dicit) because of this…
The Good News is that both these claims were filed after My father was already dead, but that doesn’t necessarily mean he didn’t know about them. If My siblings were as negligent with the insurance premiums as they were with the mortgage for allowing it to default, then neither Tiffany or My father Will be insured for these claims! They Will have to pay lawyers and any damages out of pocket (or in My father’s case, ‘remainder funds’ from the Estate). There are literally no ‘remainder funds’ available until these claims are addressed.
If Greg McConnell is suggesting the holograph Will of Tiffany Singh is binding, she has three million dollars in insurance claims to deal with before she dishes out any ‘remainder funds’!!! And I’m almost one hundred percent positive Tiffany Singh is fully liable for the damages as claimed, and doing everything she can to avoid having to deal with this (no problem running off with My father’s ashes, though)!
My father won’t be liable for putting Tiffany on his insurance, he Will just be subject to higher insurance premiums – but if he doesn’t pay those insurance premiums… Well, that’s a problem.
So today I had to remind Agent Smith that he doesn’t have any right or authority to order that costs be paid from the remainder funds of the Estate whatsoever until the creditors are dealt with. That’s a basic Principle in Trust administration based on another maxim in Law ‘Pacta Sunt Servanda’, or ‘agreements must be kept’. A loan from a creditor is a contract, and the contract must be Honoured before there is any wealth for beneficiaries.
Here is the email.
And of course there is no Word today – not from any One! How is One thing King this looks for opposing counsel from the perspective of ‘the Court’ as an impartial witness?
This is NOT like the Social Benefits Tribunal claim because technically the SBT is not a Court of competent jurisdiction. This was the only argument of opposing counsel related to the rights violate Sean. Although it is not officially recognized as a Court of competent jurisdiction by the Department of Justice and Ministry of the Attorney General, it is able to hear Ontario Human Rights Code violations, and trespass upon a Trust Instrument, or refusing to recognize that the Trustee Act of Ontario applies to all Trusts wheneven Created and all Trustees whenever appointed, IS a the most basic type of rights violation, suggesting the Trustee Act applies to all Trusts and Trustees… except Me!? And that wasn’t clearly enough articulated for Brian Killick in the hearing? Nice try, Bri!
But before We get into that, what I Wish to point out regarding the Trust Claim against My siblings, is that it IS a court of competent jurisdiction, and the Court is absolutely required to provide the Jurisdiction I am as King for in the Inform a Sean for Court use form filed with the Court at the time the Action is commenced. Translate-Sean? The Default Judgement IS binding by default, and no One has the authority or jurisdiction to overturn it because the Trust inherits jurisdiction automatically, and that jurisdiction can never be taken away in a Trust Claim (without breach of contract, breach of Trust). So the silence really does speak volumes, and it Will be interesting to see what opposing counsel does next. I have one more move of My own to make tomorrow for Terrific Tuesday. 😉
Okay, now onto the Social Benefits Tribunal Micro-Magical Victory!
As a disclaimer and warning, I was furious when I received the letter because it was addressed to ‘Sean Stephen von Dehn’, and I am very clear how I Wish for this correspondence in particular to be addressed to Me in the hearing. He’s doing this specifically to gaslight the fact that this is a Trust claim because if he makes any acknowledgement whatsoever, it is also an admission of guilt before any Court of competent jurisdiction.
Having said that, I am also more forgiving than most, and it wasn’t long before it was clear and obvious that he was also kissing My ass!!! He basically just agrees with every statement I made in the Tribunal hearing but insists that the Tribunal does not have sufficient jurisdiction to address the damages I’m as King for or the ‘Issues regarding Trust Law’. That’s about as close as he gets to admitting there is a Trust he’s knowingly trespassing upon, and (more importantly) allowing Ontario Works public Trustees to continue to believe it is acceptable. Brian should have at the very least told Caroline Forget that unless she comes up with some reason why the Trustee Act of Ontario would not apply to Sean’s Trust, she may Wish to consider doing everything she can to Honour that Trust Instrument she has on file before the rights violation is addressed by a Court with competent jurisdiction to hear the Trust Law Issues (for example). He should at the very least be telling them how to minimize the harm done, put it to a stop and resolve before it escalates out of proportion (like it hasn’t already)!
Otherwise, this is very Good News, because he does acknowledge that I am correct on every point concerning their legislation and the Ontario Works Act!!!
I’m just going to quote some choice paragraphs of what are basically nine pages saying the same thing over and over in different Words. The second paragraph summarizes the rest very plainly:
“The appeal is granted in part. The decision of the Respondent Administrator was not correct. However, the Tribunal does not have the jurisdiction to hear a number of other issues raised by the appellant.”
This next one is somewhat infuriating because it’s just more gaslighting a ‘Trustee’ for the artificial person, ‘Sean von Dehn’, the Beneficiary of the public Trust. But I’m so used to it that I also find it a little bit humorous because I’m always fascinated by what they Will do to try to avoid recognizing the Trust at all costs! It’s ridiculous, and their determination to NOT recognize the Trust only succeeds in exaggerating the trespass, which is the opposite effect they are hoping to have. If they are not knowingly trespassing upon a Trust, then why refuse to recognize that’s the issue and address Me as the Trustee?
“At the outset of the hearing, the Appellant submitted that he Wished to be referred to by the title referred to as above as “also known as” (King Sean, House von Dehn). While the Appellant was referred to by the preferred title throughout the hearing, in order to ensure this order is properly enforced, the Tribunal has identified the Appellant by the title referred to in his appeal document and in documentation provided by the Respondent, as well as his preferred title.”
The reason I find this as hilarious as I do frustrating, is because he’s actually identifying the parties to the Claim correctly!!! The Appellant is ‘Sean Stephen von Dehn’, and that’s exactly how that name should be expressed to represent the natural person (as opposed to the artificial person, ‘SEAN VON DEHN’ or similar bastardize a Sean of My Calling). The natural person is the Beneficiary of the public Trust, the artificial person is the named public Trust account connected to One’s ‘SIN’ number in the likeness of One’s name. When One is charged, it is the public Trust account that gets the charge, but the natural person accepts the position of Trustee when they answer to the charge. The Trustee then becomes liable for misuse of the public Trust account as an artificial person.
The point is, he recognizes both and ‘Sean Stephen von Dehn’ is NOT the artificial person, it is how the natural person (Beneficiary) is expressed in law (and also why they try to change it to ALL CAPS in Court filings). King Sean, House von Dehn is the Trustee for that Beneficiary, and it IS specifically to make that distinction because ‘King Sean, House von Dehn’ would not be ‘entitled’ to any remedy or appeal, only ‘Sean Stephen von Dehn’, the natural person has that right, so King Sean Acts as the Trustee advocating for the rights of the Beneficiary of the public Trust. He’s dancing around the Trust Issue, but at least he Styles and Spells the Magic of My name correctly!
For the fourth paragraph, I’m only going to point out the most critical point as it pertains to absolutely everything outside of what the Ontario Works Act allows for the Administrator to do without taking ANY rights violate Sean’s or other issues into consideration.
“The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to hear such claims for compensation or action.”
Again, it’s a very blanket statement saying not much of anything, but it is also implies by default that ‘Action’ includes advising Ontario Works agents and public Trustees that their crimes are serious when they do come before a court of competent jurisdiction, and they should probably cease and desist before escalating the Matter further. A little sound counsel for the public Trust about how all laws in Canada are binding upon all agents of the public Trust might be a Good start.
We’re jumping to paragraph 18 for the first of the really Good stuff…
“The Respondent provide the Appellant with a letter in October 2022 that indicated that the failure to provide this information would result in the Special Diet Allowance stopping “at the end of January 2023”. It is wholly unclear to the Tribunal why this was not abided to in the present matter, or why the Respondent determined that it Will reverse the decision for the months of November and December but not for the month of January 2023, when the Respondent had already been advised that even failure to produce the information would allow the benefit to continue until the end of January, 2023.
He concludes that failure to provide the benefit for January and February was also a breach of Trust and incorrect. He makes several assertions about how there was nothing legislated that provides for Ontario Works to revoke any benefit without notice and fair opportunity for the individual to respond in time to continue receiving the benefit. Basically, arbitrarily revoking My benefits and refusing to reinstate them before they were scheduled to expire was a serious breach of Trust and Principles of Justice! Specifically,
“the Tribunal finds that acting on a determination not made in Writing is a fundamental breach of natural justice because it prevents the Appellant from knowing the case to be met or the process to be followed in disputing such a determine a Sean.”
So I was (finally) successful in having them Ordered to repay Me for every month My benefits were arbitrarily revoked, but the Tribunal cannot award damages and did not even mention the privacy breach or the other Beneficiary of the public Trust who was harmed by the breach of privacy, and the Notice that was the ’cause of Action’ (motive) for retaliate-Sean and unlawful revocation of My benefits. We now have an official ruling that the revocation of My benefits was wholly unlawful, incorrect and unreasonable.
The Good News is that means that People are entitled to compensate-Sean, and now I can file with the Divisional Court because they are basically claiming ignorance and incompetence with respect to everything else in the Claim, though the Divisional Court or Superior Court can hear the Matter, and it Will be a Fabulous opportunity to file My next Trust Claim now that the Courts are getting to know Me a little better!
Love and Blessings,
Post Script – Almost forgot, I guess You Will Wish to know how much, right? Every penny they took that they didn’t have any right to take, which is $1577.00. Must be paid within sixty days, and We’re going to see how long it takes them to get it into My account. The longer it takes, the more aggravated the circumstances when We address the rights violation, breach of trust, spoliation of documents, threat of harm (arrest), et cetera… Might even consider a class action, We Will have to see.
Discover more from The Kingdom of Heaven Found a Sean
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.