Volume CCXCIII: The Tuesday Tell a Vision Edition; The SBT, and Setting the Stage for the Next Scene in this Universal Product-Sean

And of course, Universal Pictures Greatest Present a Sean, which is why this is an appropriate Post for the ‘Tell a Vision’ Tuesday Edition, though I Will not be getting back to My Matrix IV Interpret a Sean just yet. We are still waiting to see what every One has to say now that opposing counsel have been Noted in Default for their fraud, but We are especially anxious to hear what the Court Will have to say (if anything), and no Word yet. That’s three days now, not including the weekend (business days). So what next? That is what We Will be tall King about today, thing King about Setting the Stage for the next Scene – and as always, thank King or Queen You for joining Me, Your Royal, Moral Highness is a Valuable Presence in My House.

Today’s feature photo is an accounting of the Value of The Kingdom of Heaven Found a Sean’s Trust Claim in accordance with the Notice of Liability for Breach of Trust served upon them on May 29th, 2022. It was served upon them because I was tired of wondering what was going on with the March 24th application they claimed to have filed, but had not yet been processed because of ‘covid delays’. The main reason I Wished to know was because I have been watching the insurance claims since My brother first told Me about them at the beginning of 2020, so I know no One has been appointed by ‘the Court’ yet – I’ve always known.

That was in fact the whole (original) reason for protesting My sister’s application because she’d need to hire a lawyer to address the insurance claims, I was offering to do that for free. They also told Me that all the accounts were in Good standing and that the only reason the application was required was to keep the accounts in Good standing and to address the insurance claims.

There is no mention of the insurance claims whatsoever in any of Tanja’s applications, and obviously the mortgage was not still in Good standing! They lied to Me about everything, and lied to the Court by failing to let them know about these additional interested parties; the three million in insurance claims, the contentious Will of Tiffany Singh, the letter My brother found on the property which he fails to mention also has My father’s own Hand responding to My Letter, underlying the Promises he made to Me – a testamentary instrument, and if nothing else, evidence of My Written Promises (Expressed Trust) to My father almost five years before he died. Would any of these Judge’s approved Tanja’s application knowing she’d omit this information, would they have dispensed with the requirement for a bond if they knew there were three million dollars in insurance claims waiting to proceed as well? Probably not. Just a guess.

Ridiculous they would even try to suggest Tiffany’s Will means something (legally) but My father’s own hand to Me, Writ more recently than Tiffany’s holograph Will is irrelevant?! Gaslighting – and probably because what My brother did is so serious. In any event, NONE of these details are subject to the opinion of any lawyer or individual, they require due process, they are Matters of contention. They require a hearing, and for all interested parties to receive notice of that hearing. I’m not so Good with remembering the Rules of Civil Procedure enough to tell You which one that is, but that’s where it comes from, and I believe it’s under Rule 75 and contentious proceedings or something. But it is an absolute requirement and Principle in Justice for all parties to receive Notice of any Matter where the outcome may affect One’s interests.

I got off on a bit of a tangent there but it is interesting to be thing King about because as the express-Sean goes,

“Truth is like a lion. It doesn’t need defending. Set it free, it Will defend it Self.”

We’re just going to call that a proverb because I don’t remember who said it. I Wish to guess that it was St. Augustine but don’t quote Me on that. I’m going to be addressing these insurance claims on behalf of My father because My sister sure as shit isn’t going to, and the Truth Will inevitably come out. The longer it takes, the greater the harm done, the more aggravated the criminal charges become. And We just won the portion of the SBT (Social Benefits Tribunal) Claim that the Tribunal has the jurisdiction to hear, so that is Good News because it means that the Actions of the Administrator were unlawful even according to the Ontario Works Act they are relying on. That’s huge because that decision has weight in a Divisional or Superior Court, and it’s officially criminal negligence for breach of Trust, and it doesn’t even touch on the privacy breach, or the fact it was done in retaliation for failing to notify the other party of the breach and being placed on Notice for Breach of Trust! They basically responded to a Notice of Breach of Trust by suspending My benefits without any Notice to Me, and without there being any requirement in the legislation for them to do so! The motive for the Act is not even taken into consideration. They Will be in big trouble before a Divisional Court, I guarantee.

So here is My response to Brian Killick’s determination because he is just as guilty and complicit for breach of Trust but he’s already been placed on Notice and knows what’s coming, I’m sure. His decision is a half ass apology and defense for failing to take any action against the administrator for their criminal breach of Trust with malicious intent. No moral or ethical obligation to immediately fire the public Trustee and appoint some One Trust-worthy? I call gross malfeasance, breach of Trust, and criminal negligence causing harm.

Of course, I don’t Imagine there Will be any response to that email, either. Again, it might seem like the best thing to do is just ignore the Notice, but that’s exactly what a Court considers contempt in the ‘Common Law’. One should not be required to appeal to a Court to compel Honourable conduct. ‘Civil’ conduct is uncivilized. Brian knows all agents of the Administrator Acting as Trustees for Ontario Works and the City of Ottawa are Willfully trespassing upon a Trust (Testamentary Instrument), a serious (criminal) breach of Trust especially when done with intent, yet he is allowing it to continue, exaggerating and compounding the eminent claim.

As far as Setting the Stage for the next Scene in this Glow-ball Product Sean is concerned, I am considering one of three options.

First is just an Affidavit of Service Showing due process was had with an attachment of the service of documents in accordance with SBT Rules of Procedure, then fililing the Notices into the Court with the Affidavit of Service as King of the Registrar to endorse and enforce the Order.

If that doesn’t produce the results I am Wishing for, or if I simply choose this option or the next in favour of option number one, I Will file the Notices served upon Ontario Works during the SBT Appeal into an Application to the Divisional Court for Judicial review of the Tribunal’s decision. The Divisional Court decides whether or not to hear a Matter based on whether or not the previous decision made by the Tribunal (Brian Killick) is incorrect or unreasonable.

Brian asserts that on the merits of the Appeal it Self, the Actions of the Administrator were both (wholly) incorrect and unreasonable, but ruled that the Tribunal does not have the jurisdiction to deal with the rights violation portion of the claim, compelling Me to appeal to the Divisional Court or Superior Court to address the rights violation portion of the Claim, and or to receive any compensate-Sean for the wrongdoing done to Me by the breach of Trust and criminal negligence. That seems patently unreasonable to Me because I was under the impression that the Tribunal’s purpose and function was to ensure the public Trustee is not breaching the public Trust, or using the Act with malicious intent, or abusing their power in any Way. I was also under the impression that when the Tribunal discovers these things are being done, it Will put a stop to the harm and trespass immediately even if not able to award compensatory commercial damages to avert having to take the Matter to a higher Court for remedy.

And finally, I may consider yet another Claim in the Ontario Superior Court. Eventually they Will learn to Love Me, right? The difference between the Superior Court and Divisional Court is that if it is the Divisional Court it Will be a more general appeal of the Tribunal’s decision and lack of action in response the Default Judgement already awarded against the Respondents, and for failing to put the harm and trespass upon the Trust to a stop as soon as he learned of the trespass. Patently unreasonable to suggest Brian Killick doesn’t know the Trustee Act of Ontario applies to the public Trustee and any Trusts on file with their agents! How could the Trustee Act NOT apply to the public Trustee for the Administrator of the public Trust accounts? Yeah, exactly.

So lots to be thing King about, and it already Gives Me a bit of a headache because it is for the other injured party in the SBT Claim that concerns Me most, so I Will probably pick whichever option I am thing King Will produce the most expeditious outcome without compromising result.

Love and Blessings,