Volume CCXCV: The Thursday Thing King Edition; The Continuous Criminal Contempt of Caroline Forget, Aministrator, Ontario Works

Hello every One and welcome to another Thoroughly Thrilling Thing King Edition, thank King or Queen You for joining Me, it is always an Honour to have You in My House. Today is very exciting because the level of corruption among State Actors Trusted to care for some of Canada’s most marginalized People is absolutely astounding!!! Even after being Ordered by the Social Benefits Tribunal to repay medical benefits the Tribunal determined were revoked entirely unlawfully (without any due process or Notice), Caroline Forget decides to take Matters into her own hands and pay Me whatever she Wishes according to her own, independent calculations she had no intention of every discussing or having approved by any One. The public Trustee for the City of Ottawa Truly believe they are not only above the Law, the ARE the Law!!!

Yes, quite a day, ladies and gentlement. We did finally have Caroline Forget concede that she didn’t put what she was ordered to pay into the account, she made some amendments to the calculations she had no intention of ever discussing with Me, providing Me with any receipt for, or even advising Me as to when they Will be deposited into the account. If I had never followed up for some kind of explain a Sean, they were never going to tell Me and just hope I wouldn’t Notice. Fat chance, Caroline.

Caroline also asserts that Ontario Works ‘does not recognize My Trust’ and suggests it is not relevant to My file with Ontario Works. Really? So the Trustee Act of Ontario applies to all Trusts whenever Created and all Trustees whenever appointed EXCEPT Sean von Dehn’s Express Trust in God filed with Canada’s Minister of Justice and Attorney General? Interesting. And that’s not a rights violate-Sean? I wonder what One must do so that Ontario Works CAN recognize the Trust Instrument? How much You Wish to bet they Will not tell Me? (It’s top Secret, apparently.)

This really is infuriating. Consider that I would have no Way of knowing when these funds were deposited if I were not checking the account, they don’t even Wish to let Me know they’ve deposited funds into My account? Why? Because they don’t Wish for Me to verify the amount. The moment I find out, they first pretent like they fulfilled the Order, neglecting to mention it was $338.00 short of what they were Ordered to pay Me by the Tribunal! THEN, when I share the screenshot and their fraud is exposed, they try to JUSTIFY their criminal Act.

It is very much a criminal Act and another breach of Trust. They do NOT have the authority to override the Tribunal, that is the whole point to the Tribunal. It may not have much authority, but it has authority over what it can Order Ontario Works to do according to the Act – and they are REFUSING to Honour the Order awarded against them. I don’t even need to complain to Brian Killick because this Will be a perfect segway into a Divisional Court review.

Now I can tell the Divisional Court that not only was the determination that the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to hear the rights portion of the claim incorrect and unreasonable, I can also let the Divisional Court know that the Administrator is REFUSING to Honour the Decision of the Tribunal and paid whatever they believed to be correct despite the Tribunal’s order!!! That is another (criminal) breach of Trust. They also REFUSE to provide Me with Notice of the deposits to My account or any receipt showing what the payments were for.

They have now also openly stated that they Will not recognize My Trust Instrument! Although that may sound like bad News on the surface, it is the first time they have even acknowledged there is a Trust!!! The whole point to these criminals continually destroying the documents I file with their office, is to plead ignorance of the Trust because the moment they acknowledge there IS a Trust on file they are NOT Honouring, is the moment they are in SERIOUS trouble. So today Caroline just hung the entire office if that is their ‘legal position’ on the Trust.

Now all I have to tell the Divisional Court is that the public Trustee believes that the Trustee Act of Ontario applies to all Trusts whenever Created and all Trustees whenever appointed EXCEPT Sean von Dehn’s Express Trust in God filed with Canada’s Minister of Justice and Attorney General. King Sean, of House von Dehn believes this is patently incorrect and unreasonable and a serious violation of his right to Self determine a Sean. 😉

We now have a Written assertion of a rights violation, and pleading ignorance of the Trustee Act as a public Trustee (and basically some One in a ‘higher’ administrative capacity than a mere ‘case worker’, suggesting the entire office believes these incorrect and unreasonable assertions). Yeah, not likely to hold up before a Divisional Court. These are clearly and obviously incorrect and unreasonable assertions. Those are the specific grounds for the Divisional Court to hear a Claim.

I’m also going to be as King to have each of the individuals involved charged in their personal, private capacity. I’m going to be as King for this on the grounds that these individuals MUST develop this sense of immunity from prosecution for their criminal trespasses BECAUSE they believe they are immune from prosecution because they are protected by a (public) insurance bond.

Such Wilfull breaches of Trust with intent to cause harm should not be eligible for protection because it vitiates the insurance. Insurance is to protect State Actors who harm People ‘incidentally’ rather than maliciously – like if legislation allows for an Action that causes harm. If the OW Act allowed agents to revoke Benefits without Notice for any reason at any time, I couldn’t hold them liable for breach of Trust because they are acting within the legislation, despite the fact it is harmful legislation (that’s NOT the legislation, just an example from My situate-Sean).

Another example MIGHT be car insurance. Car insurance protects a driver who Acts within the law from accidents. But if a Man were to go out and drink twenty-four beers before getting in his car to drive somewhere and kill some One on the Way to where he’s going, is he still protected by insurance? I don’t know, but I am thing King that if One were to drive One’s car wrecklessly causing all kinds of harm in violation of the Law, I believe that probably negates the insurance, at least in most cases. The only reason I’m not sure is because the injured party still has to get paid, so the insurance would probably have to cover the costs, and then the insurance company would bill the insured drunk for whatever they pay out. The point is, the insurance doesn’t protect the reckless driver from criminal prosecution if they violate the law.

Similarly, the public Trustee’s bond would have to pay for the breach of Trust to the injured party but Will probably pass those costs onto the insured party and increase their premiums substantially (or never allow them to be bonded again).

They are ALL insured for millions because they are in highly Trusted positions dealing with marginalized minorities. Breaching that Trust is serious, and Ontario Works do it with absolute prejudice and contempt for those they were Trusted to SERVE. They are arguably even more narcissistic in nature than My sister – and believe Me, that’s says a LOT!!!

I also heard back from Michael Thiele today but I’m not going to bother sharing the email because it was another ‘nothing’ email asserting that he Will not be responding until a hearing is scheduled. That is fine, I’m advising him that I consider it contempt and unnecessary delay. I’m going to follow through just as I am indicating I intend to do in the Notice served upon him. If he doesn’t respond before Friday, I am going to request for the Tribunal to schedule a hearing and advise the Tribunal they do not Wish to negotiate or resolve the Matter and are refusing to respond to simple questions that would simplify the process and potentially avoid a hearing altogether.

I’m the One who looks Honourable to the impartial observer. I’m reaching out, offering to resolve, they are refusing to Show their cards. That’s fine – but believe Me, it isn’t Honourable or professional. If Michael Wishes to save MHI legal costs, all he has to do is tell the landlord to address My questions directly. The fact she can’t do that is the whole reason We’re before a Tribunal in the first place!!!

Well, so much for My Vacate-Sean. I’ll be back tomorrow because I have a couple more Notices to serve. Big surprise, right?

Love and Blessings,