Hello every One and welcome to the Witches, Wizards and Warlocks Lucky Wednesday Edition, thank King or Queen You for joining Me, We have an especially ‘Lucky’ Wednesday today, as We now have concrete proof of the City of Ottawa interfering with Federal Mail delivery and conspiring with Canada Post to steal, intercept, or defraud the recipient of Registered Mail Trusted with Canada Post, a Crown corporation.
How serious is mail fraud?
356(1) Everyone commits an offence who (a) steals (i) anything sent by post, after it is deposited at a post office and before it is delivered, or after it is delivered but before it is in the possession of the addressee or of a person who may reasonably be considered to be authorized by the addressee to receive mail, (ii) a bag, sack or other container or covering in which mail is conveyed, whether or not it contains mail, or (iii) a key suited to a lock adopted for use by the Canada Post Corporation; (a.1) with intent to commit an offence under paragraph (a), makes, possesses or uses a copy of a key suited to a lock adopted for use by the Canada Post Corporation, or a key suited to obtaining access to a receptacle or device provided for the receipt of mail; (b) has in their possession anything that they know has been used to commit an offence under paragraph (a) or (a.1) or anything in respect of which they know that such an offence has been committed; or (c) fraudulently redirects, or causes to be redirected, anything sent by post.
This is the Waybill I received that was not a ‘SUMMONS’ that the Ottawa Police Service Claimed to have sent by Way of Registered Mail on May 6th, but was (presumably) a ‘Housing Renewal Package’ sent by Ottawa’s ‘Home for Good’ program. I don’t actually have any contract with Home for Good, though they are attempting to obtain a contract with Me by sending this package and suggesting that if I do not return the package to them, they can lawfully revoke payments I have authorized to be made to My landlord from the public Trust directly for as long as I choose to rent the apartment.
They can’t actually compel Me to contract with them, they breached the contract by failing to send this package for the last three years, fraudulently claiming that My subsidy was lawfully revoked for failing to return renewal packages they never sent! They do this deliberately to frame People as ‘irresponsible’ individuals so they can cut off subsidy when in fact they are just gaslighting to cause harm to Canada’s most marginalized minority, most of whom would not be competent enough in Law to advocate for their Self, and would be compelled to rely on ‘legal aid’ who actually work for the very same government and individuals who are exploiting these People, so they just get ‘railroaded’ by the legal system because the ‘Character’ of the City of Ottawa is never in question, they are presumed impeccably Honourable, however corrupt they are.
Now, when I say I have irrefutable proof of the City of Ottawa colluding with agents of Canada Post to interfere with the delivery of Registered Mail intended for Me, it doesn’t get much better than Canada Post’s own Record and receipt pictured above. Let’s see if We can piece this fraud together.
First and foremost, this is REGISTERED MAIL, which REQUIRES for the package to be HAND delivered to Me, including My Signature (thumbprint Seal) to Show it has been received by Me (the intended recipient). The package was addressed to ‘King Sean, House von Dehn’, with ‘Hand of Stephen’ directly underneath, and the physical address below that. I know because I filled out the name that was left blank on the Waybill pictured above (which had been left blank?).
That is the first Act of fraud because the sender is paying to have the package delivered directly to Me, it is NOT to be held for pickup at the Post Office (or the box on the Waybill would have been checked). They are NOT to just place a Waybill in My mailbox and tell Me to come pick it up at some depot – that is their job and what People pay extra money for when sending ‘Registered’ mail – it is considerably more expensive than regular mail and is supposed to be expedious, and to guarantee that the package is delivered to the Hand of the intended recipient at their address.
When I took the Waybill to the depot to pick the package up, they opened up the drawer where they keep the packages and showed it to Me! Much to My surprise, it was properly addressed to ‘King Sean, House von Dehn, Hand of Stephen’, and was even Written in beautiful cursive Writing!!! It would be virtually impossible for any One to randomly ‘guess’ that the name on the package would say ‘King Sean, House von Dehn’, so when I Showed the Waybill (where I had filled in My own name in the blank space provided), it was a perfect match for the recipient named on the package they were holding. Obviously, the package was intended for Me, King Sean, of House von Dehn.
Despite this, Elizabeth ‘no last name’ (and who inherited the last name ‘Kunt’ for refusing to provide it to Me for the purpose of litigation) refused to release the package to Me without proper ‘identification’. I told Elizabeth that I shouldn’t even be required to visit her outlet because the instructions were to deliver it to Me by Hand, requiring My Signature of acceptance at My address! She continued to refuse, and I told her I would return with mail addressed to Me at the address on the package, as well as Court documents showing that I am in fact, King Sean of House von Dehn, and that I do not use any ‘government issued’ identification, which is also well known by the sender and why I presumed they had insisted on sending the package Registered mail, requiring My Signature.
At this point, things were still very civil, and Elizabeth promised Me that if I returned with proof of mail in that name to that address previously and Court documents, that would be sufficient to release the package to Me. I returned with the documents she requested, and by the time I had returned, she had ‘escalated the Matter’ because she believed I was suspicious and engaged in fraud?! That was when I was as King for her last name and advised her that I was placing her on Notice for interfering with federal mail delivery and engaging in fraud, as the Waybill tracking receipt is showing the package has already been delivered to Me, and that they have My Signature of acceptance on file. Does this look like My Signature?!
Why would the Signature Show ‘D. Cote’ if the intended recipient is ‘King Sean, House von Dehn’? Make no mistake about it People, that is FRAUD and interfering with federal mail delivery!!!
Even more curious, the Signature was obtained on the 23rd of March, one day before they are Claiming the package was delivered to Me! And Elizabeth is ‘escalating the Matter’ because she believes I’m engaged in fraud?! At this point, she threatened to call the police, and I demanded to know her name and why she was claiming the package had been delivered when it was clear and obvious that was not the case. She refused to Give Me her last name, and I advised her that if she doesn’t Give Me a last name, she is guilty of breach of Trust and fraud because she is legally and lawfully required to provide her first and last name if she is claiming to be the ‘manager’ of Canada Post responsible for fraudulently claiming the package had been delivered when the receipt clearly shows it was not Signed by Me, and the package has clearly and obviously NOT been delivered if she is still holding it. Then she said she was calling the police, and I told her she was officially a Kunt. I didn’t bother to immediately tell her that ‘Kunt’ is the last name I have decided to Give any One who refuses to provide Me with their last name when they are legally and lawfully required to do so because I believe any One who does not Wish to provide their full name for the purpose of litigation must have something to hide. If Elizabeth has done nothing wrong, she would proudly Give her name and stand on her decision.
I even attempted to wait for the police but ran out of patience because I don’t even know if they would Show up considering I now have now caught them engaged in the exact same kind of mail fraud, claiming to have sent Me a SUMMONS by Way of Registered mail when no such event took place. The police didn’t even TRY to send anything to Me by Registered mail, it was a complete sham and fraudulent statement made in their information sworn before a commissioner of Oaths and a Judge, apparently!!!
Now You know why the Ottawa Police are not looking forward to any trials where I might actually get a chance to tell a Judge what is going on because this is the kind of corruption One generally only reads about in crime drama fiction novels!
Even more curious, the receipt of Signature is dated June 10th, 2024, and they are claiming that the package was delivered on May 24th, and that the Signature was obtained a day previous, May 23rd!?! I can hardly wait to be tall King with customer service at Canada Post about this to see what kind of incredible gymnastics they try to perform to explain this fraud!
The detailed receipt Claims that the package was delivered twice! Once on May 23rd, and again on June 14th! For the Record, I still have not received this package!!! This is not only proof that the City of Ottawa is engaged in fraud, but that they are colluding with agents of Canada Post to interfere with My mail delivery?! Apparently (after returning to ask another agent at the same depot about the conflict in the Signature and date claiming it was already delivered) the package was returned to sender and has officially been received by the original sender. They have no intent to deliver the package, I need to file a complaint with Canada Post, and the gentleman was very professional, invited Me behind the kiosk to look at his computer so that I could see what the system was telling him about the package, and he conceded that the entire thing looks very suspicious, and provided Me with the contact numbers to escalate the complaint for fraudulent delivery and interfering with federal mail service.
Today, I returned to Rexall (which really stand for ‘wrecks all’) to use their Post office to mail a payment to Ottawa Hydro, only to have the manager of the store tell Me that I have been ‘trespassed’ from the store for ‘inappropriate behaviour’. I told the manager that he does not have any right to trespass Me because I have done nothing wrong. He said I was using abusive language with his staff, and I have never used abusive language with any of his staff, the manager of Canada Post refused to Give Me her last name, so I advised her that I would Give her One until I discover what it is, and that name is ‘Kunt’ – K.U.N.T., Kunt!
“Oh, that’s clever, isn’t it?”
“Look, I’m not engaged in fraud and claiming packages have been delivered when they are standing there holding the package they claim to have delivered. She did not Wish to Give Me her last name because she is guilty of a federal, indictable offense, and I am quite happy to wait for police to arrive.”
Once again, he did call the police and as he was trying to provide a physical description, I offered to help him by raising My voice enough for the police officer he was tall King with to hear Me, “Just tell them it’s King Sean, House von Dehn, I Trust they Will know who You are tall King about!”
As One might guess, they did not Show up and I was with a Good Friend of mine today who ran short on time, otherwise he said he would have been happy to wait with Me until the store closed if necessary to explain the hostility of the manager toward Me for no reason whatsoever. It was Good to have a Friend there for a change, and it was the manager who told Me he reviewed the video of My last visit to Canada Post where he saw Me behind the kiosk. I told him he was correct and that the staff were very professional and courteous, they invited Me behind the kiosk, I did not trespass and was not ‘trespassed’ by the agent working that day, I left without any incident whatsoever because he wasn’t involved in the fraud – it’s that simple.
What does the official tracking record say today?
Says the package was delivered to the recipient on June 14th, including a Signature to Show receipt of delivery on the intended recipient. Once again, does this look like My Signature?!
Canada Post is engaged in fraud, and the manager of the Rexall (wrecks all) Canada Post outlet, Elizabeth Kunt is the one responsible for escalating the Matter and refusing to release the package to Me, even though it is Canada Post’s obligation to deliver the package to My address (not to the depot) and to require My Signature, which should match the Signature on the package being delivered.
It Will be very interesting to find out who D. Cote is, won’t it. I wonder how Elizabeth Kunt Will feel after reading this Post, as I’m sure she is involved, I just don’t know to what extent.
A few Words My Friend had to say to Me about the incident today include:
“I felt very sorry for the guy at that pharmacy, he was very frightened and shaking – he could have let everything go normally without causing himself embarrassment and high blood pressure. Some poor People like him Will end up having a miserable Life”
God’s Impartial Witness
What My Friend says is True. The manager was clearly terrified. Initially, I had to return to the car to get the mail I Wished to send, and by the time I had returned the manager was standing in front of the entrance doors to the store, obviously trying to be imposing and acting as a ‘door Man’. He greeted Me with a (forced) cheerful, “How are You, Sir”?
“Fabulous, thank You!”, as I walk right by him. He follows Me into the store and tells Me I have to leave I am trespassing on private property! I just laughed, told him he’s an idiot if he believes this is private place of business with a federal mail depot in the back of the store, and that attempting to trespass Me when I am here to do business with Canada Post is interfering with federal mail delivery and an indictable offence.
I Will be returning to place him on Notice sometime in the near future, along with Elizabeth Kunt. What Will the two of them be looking at with respect to punishment for the offence?
(3) Everyone who commits an offence under subsection (1)
(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than 10 years; or
(b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 356; 2009, c. 28, s. 6
Blessings,
Discover more from The Kingdom of Heaven Found a Sean
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.