Hello every One and welcome to the Thoroughly Thrilling Thing King Edition, thank King or Queen You for joining Me, it is always an Honour and Pleasure to have the Gift of Your Presence in My House. Yes, fell-low Kings and Queens, the Ombudsman for Canada Post are nothing but a cloak for fraud to Give unsuspecting Canadian citizens the ‘illusion’ of impartiality and accountability. Canada Post Ombudsman’s ‘investigation’ continues to double down the agents of Canada Post and the City of Ottawa’s fraud, suggesting the (fraudulent) Signature they have on file showing I received the documents (who is in fact a City of Ottawa receiver for Canada Post named ‘D. Cote’) was only Signed by the City of Ottawa to Show it had been returned to sender on June 14th, despite the fact that the Ombudsman concede that it was not entered into the system properly and incorrectly shows it was redirected to Me ‘at My new address’, rather than ‘returned to sender’. If the Ombudsman don’t know that is fraud by definition, I most certainly do and believe a Divisional Court Will, too.
Yes, Ladies and Gentle-Men, the conspiracies taking place in My Microcosm are far too Good to stay in My Microcosm, I am thing King that the People of Canada have a right to know just how corrupt the City of Ottawa are, and how their corrupt-Sean has infiltrated virtually every arm of government and its alleged ‘watchdog’ committees. At the end of the day, the government of Canada pays both the Ombudsman and the agents for Canada Post – when they are both corrupt, neither can be Trusted. It is a conflict of interest unless a branch can be Truly independent (meaning they are not compelled to bite the hand that feeds them to do their job).
The Ombudsman for Canada Post have confirmed that the Signature on file is not mine, the package was never delivered to Me, the City of Ottawa provided the Signature on file, and even asserted that Rexall can trespass Me from their store for any reason they Wish, even if My only business is with Canada Post. They also decide to defame My Character by suggesting I was trespassed for ‘inappropriate behaviour’ when I was threatened with trespass immediately after being told that Elizabeth KUNT had ‘escalated the Matter’, and that she didn’t care what documents I had to Show her, she would not be releasing the package to Me – after explicity Promising Me that she would, and after I had just spent two hours of My day to return home and retrieve the documents she was as King Me for! She tells Me she’s not releasing the package to Me and if I don’t agree to leave peacefully, I Will be trespassed. Any One would be offended!!! I went to their location reporting fraud, complaining that they were claiming to have delivered a document to Me with My Signature on file that Elizabeth is standing in front of Me holding!!! What is clear and obviously True to any One with two war King brain cells, is NOT clear and obvious to Elizabeth Kunt, Canada Post, or the Ombudsman, and is the polar opposite of what Canada Post is claiming to be True – make not mistake about it, that is FRAUD by definition.
How else does One KNOW that whoever authored this decision is colluding and conspiring with the City of Ottawa with malicious intent? Well, aside from having to be morally and ethically bankrupt to suggest that perpetrating fraud on an individual and claiming to have delivered documents to him that he did not receive and resulted in a N4 Notice to end his tenancy because it pertained to a critical housing subsidy, NO ONE is taking accountability for the decision. No One Signs off on the appeal, it is ANONYMOUS!
I guess it Will be ‘Beth Lambert’, the director of investigations for Canada Post who Will be held accountable in her personal, private capacity (unless she identifies as a he, of course – don’t Wish for any One to be thing King I’m ‘gender-phobic’…).
If One reads the entire document, You Will discover it does not mention a single detail regarding their investigation, it just covers over Canada Post’s policies, concedes that the City of Ottawa Signed for My package, fails to explain why or how the Signature was obtained on May 23rd (especially since they claim it is on file to show it was returned to the City of Ottawa on June 14th!?), fails to address the fraud in the image that is visible above (the red date stamp reads May 24, but they have changed the 4 to a ‘3’ with a red pen?), fails to disclose any of the findings of all these alleged interviews they conducted, but asserts that My conduct was inappropriate based on the hearsay testimony of the People being investigated for claiming to have receipt of delivery of service of important documents in fraud?! Fraud regarding a testamentary instrument or involving any public money greater than $5000.00 is subject to a minimum jail term of no less than two years. The Canada Post Act (or whatever legislation they rely on) states that the corporation shall not be liable for loss or damages resulting from postal delivery.
Once again, this is legalese – sounds fancy and terminal, but it really means nothing. No Man (regardless his or her kind) is able to engage in criminal conduct. Attempting to use a corporate protect-Sean to avoid accountability and liability when One knows (or ought to know) that wrongdoing has been done, the Rule of Law Will not ignore the individual’s personal involvement in the Matter. If People could engage in criminal conduct and be absolved of personal accountability for their criminal acts by acting as an agent for a corporation, the Nazis would only need to have registered their organization as a corporation and they could do whatever they Wish, right? Just following orders? Just following what ‘Canada Post’ tells One to do, even if it is in direct conflict with One’s own logic, reason, and moral compass, is not going to be a believable argument. The individuals responsible for the criminal collusion between Canada Post and the City of Ottawa who are causing all this harm to a Crown corporation’s repute a Sean and the Crown’s corporate image Will very much be accountable, and I don’t believe giving them ‘a pass’ for fraud that constitutes a federal, indictable offense is ‘reasonable or correct’. Those are the grounds upon which One forumulates One’s appeal to the Divisional Court.
I may as well include My reply to the Ombudsman as well. Beth ‘the Licentious’ Lambert Will be placed on Notice of Civil and Criminal Liability in her personal, private capacity at 5:00 PM tomorrow if she does not escalate the Matter and press criminal charges against the City of Ottawa’s Kelly Kritsch (who is the One engaging in the fraud for the City of Ottawa, ‘conveniently’ and ‘coincidentally’ also claiming that the Signature was obtained on June 14th when the package was returned to her). Canada Post’s own receipt dated June 10th says otherwise…
Here’s the official public Record (which directly conflicts with every finding of the investigation) as of five o’clock this afternoon….
The confirmation receipt of delivery was available at 7:34 A.M, which is the time they are claiming to have delivered it to Me by hand? Since when does any One deliver mail at 7:34 in the morning? The only person who (coincidentally enough) sends Me emails at 7:30 in the morning is Kelly Kritsch – but that’s probably just a coincidence, right?
I don’t think so. I think Kelly the Colluding Kritsch was up bright and early making sure she could have ‘D. Cote’ provide a signature so that it Will appear as though she has delivered the documents to Me when they are inevitably returned to her (for failing to fill out the Waybill correctly, for failing to attempt to deliver the package to My door, for leaving the name blank). She instructed for Canada Post to not even bother attempting to deliver the package knowing I don’t use government issued identification and that if Canada Post were going to require it, that I would not be able to receive the documents. And Canada Post can tell Me whatever they Wish about their policy, that is all fine and well, but FRAUD is FRAUD. If the receipt claimed I did not have government issued identification and so the package was returned to sender, THAT WOULD BE FINE BECAUSE THAT IS THE TRUTH.
But Canada Post are STILL (publicly) claiming that the package was delivered to Me – not once, but TWICE, and with My Signature on file!?
Remember, the Canada Post Act only states that the corporation Will not be liable for harm or loss as a result of failure to deliver mail as Promised – it does not provide any immunity for State Actors or People war King for the corporation who violate federal law to abuse their position to engage in fraud with malicious intent. If Canada Post Ombudsman doesn’t Wish to provide Me with the names of agents responsible for these federal crimes against Me, Beth the licentious Lambert Will accept liability in Canada Post’s stead (and for the abuse I was subject to at the Hands of ‘Wrecks-all’ (Rexall) staff).
Love and Blessings,
Discover more from The Kingdom of Heaven Found a Sean
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.