Volume CCLXXXIV: The Terrific Two’s Day Edition; Siblings Cast Some Protect-Sean Spells

Hello every One, and welcome to the Terrific Two’s Day Edition, thank King or Queen You for joining Me, it is always an Honour to have You in My House. Today I really do have a Terrific Two’s Day Edition because I Will be back with a Matrix Interpret a Sean later this evening to make this a Two’s Day True to its name, and I have more examples of how the Spelling of Words Cast into a Court are providing some ‘Protect-Sean’ from potential Prosecute-Sean for My siblings on September Seventh.

I also believe it is another Fabulous example of how the Courts communicate inform a Sean in Code. The whole point to My Matrix Interpret a Sean is that I am proposing it’s a perfect metaphor for Man’s Macrocosm. The Laws of Man’s Macrocosm have been ‘codified’, and that is a very literal Truth, Canada’s ‘Criminal Code’ being a great example.

Yesterday, I was tall King about how a Motion that was initially requested to be heard by Zoom conference was determined by Justice Sally A. Gomery that the Motion should be heard in person. This was only a few minutes before a long weekend, and less than a week before the hearing date of September 7th.

I was tall King about how this is not Good for My siblings. Although lawyers can potentially gaslight indefinitely (apparently), swearing lies into an Affidavit doesn’t make something True. For a limited time, an Affidavit of lies can appear to be True – convincing enough for even a Superior Court Judge like Justice Hooper to believe long enough to make the wrong decision. That’s why the decision was vacated.

If We’re going to presume that Justice Jaye Hooper is an Honourable Justice and was not conspiring with opposing counsel (which of course would be very bad), We basically have to presume that the Judge only made the incorrect decision she made because she was unfairly influenced by the fraudulent testimony of opposing counsel. In her defense, Justice Jaye Hooper could reasonably argue that it was inconceivable to believe that lawyers would try to perpetrate fraud on the Court. A Rule 21 Motion does not allow a Judge to consider evidence whatsoever, including checking to see if Tanja Johnson’s Appointment or Application is Showing on the Registry. Swearing an event took place, doesn’t Magically update the Registry or change the facts. The Truth Will eventually come out and I advised the Court that the Decision could not legally be accepted for fraud on the Court of Record. The Court had no object-Sean, the Judge did not respond.

Now, opposing counsel believe that the Decision was not vacated, and that might be True until an individual with sufficient jurisdiction and authority hears why the decision is void. My belief, is that the Court knows the Decision was vacated. Keep in Mind that when I say ‘the Court’ I am specifically tall King about the institution of the Crown.

Also Keep in Mind, the last time a Judge made an incorrect decision based on false testimony Presented by My opposing counsel (the City of Ottawa), I actually made an ex-parte Motion to the Court to explain why the Order needed to be vacated (in the interest of Justice and repute a Sean of the Crown), and to have the Justice suspended from further adjudication regarding the Matter for conflict of interest.

The Judge had dismissed as ‘frivolous and vexatious’ without any request to do so ever having been filed with the Court. Even more auspicious, it was actually the Court that emailed Me with the Title of the Claim in the heading (after it had just been dismissed the day previously) advising Me that I can make an ex-parte Motion to the Court in Writing if I believe the Rules were violated, and provided Me with links to the applicable forms and Rules. In fact, I believe it was Derek Bert who sent the email advising Me I can still bring a Motion related to the Matter.

I filed an ex-parte Motion to Vacate the Judge’s Order and to suspend the Justice from further adjudication related to the Matter, and cited the Claim number the Order was related to with My supporting inform a Sean. Basically, I was still skeptical it was even possible but figured there was no harm in as King the Court if they Will hear it.

Five weeks later, they replied to tell Me that they Will hear My Motion in Writing, and to serve My documents (the ex-parte Motion) on opposing counsel. The Notice of receiving the email tall King about the Court’s decision to hear My Motion is My most listened to podcast on Spotify. As soon as the city of Ottawa was served with the Notice, ‘associate legal counsel’ handed the Matter over to ‘senior legal counsel’ for the Lawyer of Record regarding the Matter. The Judge? Honourable Justice, Sally A. Gomery.

Same Judge that Denied Christopher Chrisman-Cox’ request to Dismiss under Rule 2.1.01(6) in this Matter. I even accused Christopher of the same trick as the City of Ottawa because the Rule states that I must (Shall) receive Notice if One makes a request to Dismiss and the Court is considering the Motion. Notice why not Giving Me Notice of the request was not a violation of the Rules? The Words in Law are very specific.

“If the Court is considering a request under Rule 2.1.01(6), the Court Shall…

Rules of Civil Procedure, paraphrasing, 2.1.01(6) summary procedure

The Court is under no obligate Sean to let Me know of any requests to dismiss they are not considering – they are only required to Give Me Notice if they are considering a request. This is important inform a Sean if You Wish to understand how the Courts speak in code. Theoretically, the Court didn’t have to respond to Christopher at all! Why?

He’s actually violating a Rule, albeit a minor one this time. Rule 2.1.01(6) does not apply after a party has entered a pleading. This is a point that should be well enough known that if the Court did not respond to Christopher’s request at all, he should understand what the Court is telling him by their silence, or they would simply respond to say that Rule 2.1.01(6) is not applicable after pleadings.

The Courts responded to let Me know that Christopher had tried to bring this Motion and Gave the requisition to Justice Gomery because I had requested to vacate one of her Orders previously, as King of her to be suspended from further jurisdiction regarding the Matter. If People are thing King that is a coincidence, they Will never understand the language of the Court.

The Court Wished for Me to know that despite making a request to vacate a previous Order in another Matter, Justice Gomery doesn’t appear to hold a grudge, and can be Trusted to be objective and impartial. The Justice also Honours the Style and Heading of the Denial request exactly as a Trust Claim should be Styled. That is not a coincidence, either, Trust Me!

The Judge certainly isn’t flattering Me in any Way, Gomery states that some of the statements in the Claim are ‘untennable’, and that she’s not even suggesting the Matter should proceed to discovery. The Judge suggests ‘joining’ the Rule 21 Motion hearing, and it sounds as if the Judge may even be in support of a request to dismiss under a different Rule. It’s not really a ‘favourable’ Endorsement for any party, it’s very ‘non-partisan’ (as an Endorsement should be). Do Keep in Mind, I may be entirely incorrect in My Interpret a Sean.

I mentioned yesterday that the decision of Gomery to have the Motion heard in person (when it was requested by Moving Parties to be virtual) is extremely unusual, especially this close to the date of the hearing. I mentioned that I believe it is because People Will be getting arrested.

Now this is one of those situate Sean’s where I’m not necessarily excited to watch My Words Magically Manifest. One must remember, these are still My siblings We are tall King about. Don’t get Me wrong, I’m furious about what they are trying to do, but I have zero intent Sean of ruining their Life. My belief, is that My sister and brother are Trusting their legal counsel who have been leading them both down a very dangerous path, and that the lawyers should be held accountable, not My siblings (except as outlined in My Reply Factum).

None the less, I predicted that Christopher Chrisman-Cox would follow up with an email to the Court in tandem with Neil’s email from Friday, providing the Kaufman Endorsement Showing that all parties had agreed for the Motion to be heard virtually. Once again, My Words Magically Manifest. An email to the Court ready to be received minutes after the Court reopens after the long weekend.

All I hear is,

“Whaaaah… I don’t want to come to Ottawa!!!”

Seriously. One point upon which I Will have to concede I was wrong, is that My belief was that the Court would not reply. I believed they are so angry because of the fraud the Moving Parties have already perpetrated on the Court, that the Court would not respond at all, award default judgment against any party that doesn’t Show up, and Issue war Rants for the arrest of same.

A Friend of mine joined Me for a walk today and was saying to Me that he also believes that the instruction to appear in person is Good but that ‘just because they are lawyers’ they Will find a Way to snake their Way out of it.

Unfortunately, I had to concede that My Friend might be correct because it is short Notice and it’s uncustomary in general to change the format for hearing a Motion from what the Moving Party has requested unless there was some unusual circumstance (covid caused many hearings ‘in person’ to be heard virtually because it was determined to be in the best interest of the public at the time, for example).

Also, although the Court does like to Give some ‘not so subtle’ clues sometimes that things might not go the Way One was thing King they Will, they don’t ever Wish for those clues to be not so subtle that One becomes suspicious… Just enough to make One a little nervous – especially if they are up to something nefarious (like fraud).

The other Issue is appeal. The Court doesn’t ever Wish to Give One grounds for appeal because having a decision overturned by another Court IS one of the worst things that can happen to a Judge. If the parties didn’t Show up because it was such short Notice and default judgment was awarded against them in their absense, would they have grounds for appeal? Maybe, right? So let’s make sure that’s not an option…

If You don’t feel like reading it, this is the ‘Protect-Sean Spell’ My siblings’ lawyers managed to Cast to avoid Prosecute-Sean a little while longer.

There are so many Secrets coded into this Endorsement they are too numerous to be tall King about. Also, it is worth mentioning that one of the Secrets they are as King of Me, is not to decode any more Court Secrets until Judgment Day is upon Us!

I don’t Wish to spoil the Surprise for any One, but if You read the Endorsement, it sounds like King Sean, House von Dehn might be the One getting arrested!!!

Never a dull moment, Ladies and Gentlemen, never a dull moment.

Back with a Matrix Interpret a Sean in a bit!!!

Love and Blessings,