Tribunal Tribulations – The LTB, Michael the Tyrannical Thiele, and Criminal Slumlord, MHI

Hello every One and welcome to the Magical Monday Motive a Sean Edition of the Good News Journal, thank King or Queen You for joining Me, it is always a Pleasure to receive the Gift of Your Presence.

Typically, when I advise a Court or Tribunal that the adjudicator (Judge, Justice or Chair) has violated his or her Oath and that I am vacating the Order and suspending the Judge for overstepping their jurisdiction and authority, I never hear from them again, they go into ‘ghost’ mode and the entire case is paused indefinitely.

That’s what’s happened with Civil Claim 21-86803 and Civil Claim 22-89835. The Court just refuses to return correspondence or settle the Order. Why? Because they don’t Wish for Canada’s People to know that One can vacate a judge’s order or refuse to accept an Order One knows was obtained in fraud. Fraus Omnia Vitiate, Maxim in Law. They Wish for People to believe that corrupt judges can ‘railroad’ individuals and there is nothing One can do about it. Wrong.

Fraus Omnia Vitiate – ““Fraus omnia vitiat” is a Latin phrase that translates to “fraud vitiates everything”. It is a legal principle that states that any fraud in a legal transaction makes it completely invalid.

Fraud on the Court of Record stands to sully the entire Case Law database, so it must be reported and the Court has a duty and obligation to investigate the fraud and vacate the Order.

Today, I have some very Good News for You because I was going to Show You that the LTB’s tribunal portal showed that the hearing changed from ‘Hearing Scheduled Dec. 11th’ to ‘To be Scheduled’, proving that either no Order was made, or any Order that was made, was vacated.

However, today I received a direct reply to My Notice of Criminal Liability and Notice of Claim served upon James W. Campbell of the LTB.

This is encouraging because I believe William knows this Matter is urgent, so it was thoughtful of him to include the forms to request an Urgent hearing. I Will be making the Urgent request sometime later this week.

MHI has also ammalgamated with Gloucester Housing Corporation so that they now manage over one thousand units in the City of Ottawa! MHI refuses to provide rent receipts to their clients (which is a violation of the Residential Tenancies Act) and was found to be grifting an sixty dollars a month from Me! Multiply that by a thousand units, and We have theft of public money to the tune of sixty thousand dollars a month!!!

Yeah, I would say that constitutes an Urgent hearing, as does the continuous emotional and psychological abuse I am subject to by Way of professional ‘gaslighting’. Not responding to correspondence when One has a legal and lawful obligation to do so is a form of psychological abuse recognized by the Courts.

“High Court case – In January 2022, the High Court case Re B-B (Domestic Abuse: Fact-Finding) was the first to use the term “gaslighting”. The case involved allegations of domestic abuse and coercive behavior between parents over child arrangements. 

Coercive control – Gaslighting is a form of coercive control, which is illegal. Coercive control is when someone uses force, threats, or manipulation to gain control over another person’s behavior and choices. 

Emotional and psychological abuse – Gaslighting is a type of psychological abuse, which is a form of emotional abuse. Psychological abuse involves using verbal and social tactics to control someone’s way of thinking. 

Gaslighting is a tactic that can be used in any relationship to gain power over another person. It can start with small lies and putting someone down, and can lead to confusion, loss of confidence, and a dependency on the abuser. 

If you are experiencing gaslighting, you can reach out to a domestic violence shelter or program for support. You can also make a safety plan with a trusted friend, family member, or shelter worker.”

Banishing some One from the community under threat of eviction for failing to comply, is clearly a form of abuse. As a landlord, refusing to respond to basic emails is contempt and ‘gaslighting’, designed to demoralize the individual, ‘You’re not even worthy of reply or explanation, We can make whatever accusations against You Wish, and if You complain about it, We Will ignore You and attempt to have You evicted.’.

The idea is to infuriate and antagonize so that One lashes out at their abuser so that they can turn around and play the victim – exactly what MHI is doing. I request receipts, they just don’t reply. I’m not ‘worthy’ of a response.

Anyway, that’s all for today.

But if Michael the Tyrannical Thiele hated Me before, he Will really hate Me now because his intent was to never respond to a single correspondence, suggesting the Claim fails to articulate a clear ’cause of action’. It’s the most ridiculous argument because generally this degree of contempt (not responding to a claim at all) is a cause of Action in and of it Self and would never be tolerated by a Court or Tribunal. It’s just Michael the Tyrannical Thiele testing Me to see what he can get away with, presuming as a ‘Self Presented Litigant’ and humble King, that I Will be too incompetent to do anything about it. Of course a landlord has a legal and lawful obligation to respond to Me.

Now he knows I Will not tolerate corrupt adjudicators and that they Will be placed on Notice in the landlord’s stead if they fail to provide relief and remedy for the continuous trespasses against Me.

For those who may have been thing King I can’t vacate orders and suspend judges… Well, this is Your proof.

Love and Blessings,