Volume LXXI: Thing King of Shelley VanBuskirk; Breach of Public Trust

Hello every One, and welcome to the Thursday Thing King Edition of the Good News Journal, thank You for joining Me.  Tomorrow Will be two weeks from the date of delivery of My Letter of Demand for compensation for the harm done to Me by the negligence of Housing Services, the organization Trusted to ensure emergency shelters contracted by the city to provide emergency shelter services for Ottawa’s People are Acting in compliance with their contractual agreements.  Wow, what a mouthful!

Needless to say, I have no Idea what to expect, except that I Will get a reply.  Geneviève Langlais, associate legal council for the city of Ottawa is not like Jason Prevost, Deanna Vecchiarelli, Caroline Franks, M.P. Lloyd Longfield and so many others who refuse to respond to a Letter when they are backed into a corner; Geneviève is Honourable.  So I have every reason to believe I Will receive a response, though I have no Idea what it Will be.

$137,000.00 may sound like a lot of money but it really isn’t; not when One considers that My rights were violated daily for a period of four months after informing both the director of the program, Drew Corley, and the general manager, Jason Prevost, that compelling Me (and other clients) to participate in religious activities against My Will is a violation of the Ontario Human Rights Code.  That makes the offence Willful and deliberate (not that ignorance of the Law is any kind of an excuse, anyway).  Never mind the Way the complaint was initially ignored by the investigative branch (Housing Services), or that the same organization committed fraud on at least one occasion with respect to several issues.  Considering that the Salvation Army was compelling all clients to participate in religious services in order to participate in any of their programs the entire time I was a client, it seems reasonable to believe the practice was nothing new and has probably been going on since the Salvation Army first developed their social programs.  Housing Services never once noticed this?

One of the obligations of emergency shelters in the provision of social programs is to ensure that Housing Services (the city) are provided copies of all applications to social programs for which they are receiving city funding.  Presumably this is done so the city knows how many People are in the program, and also so they have some kind of Idea what services the programs are offering the client(s).  So Housing Services never once reviewed any of the application forms for the social programs the city is funding?

Shelley also indicated that Housing Services cannot compel shelter operators to provide copies of any of the application forms which is either a lie or another Act of negligence on the part of Housing Services that further demonstrates their incompetence with respect to reviewing the shelters and protecting the rights of Ottawa’s People.

I believe Geneviève Langlais Will know the investigation proves I’ve been seriously harmed by My experience, Willfully attacked and demoralized by both the Salvation Army management and Shelley VanBuskirk/Housing Services, and treated with extreme prejudice by both the Salvation Army and the Housing Services investigative branch – that doesn’t mean Shelley VanBuskirk Will do the right thing.  And My intuition tells Me the final decision Will be up to her – she hasn’t even retracted her unwarranted attack upon the Good Nature of My Character.

One of My unique qualities is My ability to see an argument from both sides.  Housing Services got caught committing fraud.  That is a very serious offence.  The moment that was discovered, Shelley VanBuskirk should have been replaced (at least in My opinion).  If I were on city council and I found out that the investigative branch Trusted to ensure the rights of Ottawa’s People are protected were Willfully lying to members of council and chair deans on Matters that concern taxpayer spending, I would be furious – and You can bet I would have her removed immediately and I would probably hire an independent organization to go into all the shelters with a copy of the emergency shelter standards to provide a non-partisan investigation before anyone from the Salvation Army might have time to bribe them.  That’s what should have been done.  Unfortunately, because Shelley VanBuskirk’s negligence is so serious, it appears she is trying to cover her tracks.  You know what they say, once One tells a lie, it just gets bigger and bigger and bigger until eventually the Truth comes out.

So who knows, maybe Shelley Will offer some earth shattering apology, admit that she was negligent in her duties, claim it was an ‘honest’ mistake, offer something to compensate Me for My injuries, and be as King of Me for Give-ness.

“Ask and thou Shall receive.”

The Honourable thing for Housing Services to do, would have been to offer Me something for My injuries; anything would have been better than nothing, and that offer should have been made upon the conclusion of their investigation.  Instead, Shelley attacks the Good nature of My Character for no reason.  That is probably the most infuriating detail of this investigation.  Not only was I not ‘made whole’, but the investigative branch Willfully caused Me further injury – and I’m to believe I’m not being discriminated against?

So, if the response I receive tomorrow is not favourable, not only Will I pursue the Matter in the Superior Court, I Will file criminal charges against Shelley VanBuskirk of the Housing Services branch for breach of the public Trust.

Breach of trust by public officer

122 Every official who, in connection with the duties of his office, commits fraud or a breach of trust is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, whether or not the fraud or breach of trust would be an offence if it were committed in relation to a private person.

R.S., c. C-34, s. 111

Again, not a huge fan of Canada’s legal fiction, but I do find some gems now and then.  Above, “whether or not the fraud or breach of Trust would be an offence if it were committed in relation to a private person.”

Basically, a ‘private person’ is a special kind of person with a different status than the ‘public’ citizen.  In layman’s terms, it means they can’t claim it’s not a breach of public Trust because I’m Sovereign.  Even if the code didn’t apply to the Sovereign, I am not the only one who was affected by Shelley VanBuskirk’s fraudulent claims to chair deans and members of council, so I could still Act as an informant to the Court Justice.

So if the Letter isn’t favourable and indicative of serious regret and remorse for the harm done both to Me and other clients of the shelter subject these conditions, I Will file criminal charges against the Housing Services branch and Shelley VanBuskirk in particular as the ‘Voice’ of the organization.

Wow, I didn’t mean for this to be so long!  In Case You are wondering why I used a picture of a flower for this Post, I figure I Will be tall King about Our Tarot read on and off for potentially the next six months or longer (I really do have a lot of information to share) and I can’t just Keep posting the same images – that gets boring.  So My intention was to brighten up Your day as this hibiscus bloom did mine.  I pollinated this beautiful lady today, too (and saved some of the pollen to cross germinate future hibiscus plants)!

In case You are wondering how to pollinate a hibiscus, I took a little video (though I’m not a great director, You Will have to look at the photo to see the results, but I am thing King One gets the Idea).

And finally, I thought I would share a little experiment I tried propagating Schefflera Arboricola…

Alright, every One, hope You are having a Thrilling Thursday, thank You so much for being here.

Love and Blessings,