Hello every One, and welcome to the Fabulous Free Lance Friday Edition, thank King You for joining Me. It is a Fabulous Friday today because at least a couple of the Ideas I have Presented to You here are becoming new ‘potentialities’ in Man’s Macrocosm and I Love it when I see the Magic of My Words made Manifest.
Yeah, so there are ‘theories’ that SarsCoV2 was developed in a lab and that it originated in some kind of animal (bats are the most popular theory). One theory, is that the virus was manipulated by lab technicians so that it could spread more easily and ‘jump’ from animals to Man’s kind, for what is called ‘gain of function’ research. Allegedly, this is a technique commonly used to study viruses, making them more contagious so that the effects of vaccines can be studied. In My opinion, it is ridiculous because it’s kind of like metaphorically opening Pandora’s box just to see if One can get all that evil back in the box once it escapes. And if they can’t?.. Well, we’ll worry about that later. Now is later in this metaphoric scenario.
Fauci was known to be involved with gain of function research in other projects and gain of function research was made illegal in the United States. Theories suggest that because it was banned in the United States, U.S. scientists like Fauci took their research project to the Wuhan lab in China where gain of function research is not forbidden. The ‘big’ theory that is no longer being removed from Facebook ‘fact-checkers’, is that China was performing gain of function research on bats to produce a coronavirus that could transmit to Man’s kind – that virus infected individuals in the lab, was not contained, and the WHO played a major role in covering up the outbreak – that’s the ‘conspiracy theory’ in a nutshell.
I personally don’t believe it is a conspiracy theory, I would take it one step further and suggest gain of function research was being used to specifically increase the contagion levels of a virus that Man’s kind would have no natural immunity to (because it is a ‘novel’ (new), man-made corona virus) so that a vaccine would be necessary and highly marketable. The WHO organization helped to cover up Wuhan’s lab outbreak because they are funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation who are hoping to profit some 20 trillion dollars from the vaccines that would be created to fight it, and the lockdown would also ensure China’s economic dominance on the world stage. If it wasn’t a planned, carefully orchestrated biological attack on the world’s People by China, the WHO, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, those three entities sure got lucky, as they are some of the only organizations in the world to benefit tremendously from the plight of the world’s People and the recent pandemic. What a ‘joy’ to know I can share these thoughts with You without having to worry about being ‘banned’ by the propaganda police commonly known as ‘fact-checkers’.
The included video today shows the CDC answering (vaguely) some questions regarding masks and the origin of SarsCoV2. You Will notice that the senator does not have to explain to the CDC representative what gain of function research is, suggesting the practice is well known and not a ‘conspiracy theory’.
Although it is very hard to find conclusive evidence to support My theory because the information police keep removing information, viruses are generally species specific. Recently, more and more viruses have been ‘jumping’ from a particular species to Man’s kind. I personally do not believe this is possible in the natural world. I believe every virus that has ‘jumped’ species was created in a lab using gain of function techniques that enable the virus to infect man’s kind for the purpose of creating a pandemic to manufacture demand for a virus that Will make pharmaceutical companies (and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in particular) boatloads of money at the expense of the People. That’s how ‘evil’ these psychopaths are. They have zero regard for the Value of Life, and this is why it is so hard for common People to believe any of these theories, because they would only seem believable to a sociopath. It is not comprehensible to any One with a moral code of ethics. People would be amazed what People Will do for wealth and power – it is a drug more addictive than heroine or even their adrenochrome (which is a real thing – look it up only if You have a very strong stomach).
What else is going on? Well, I’m thing King about who I’m going to file paperwork into the court against first. Ontario Works claimed that they do not acknowledge the U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Freedoms and don’t believe the rights afforded by the covenant may be ‘imposed’ upon them. Well, I was actually researching something else but I came across Canadian Charter violations in My research and what do You think I found?..
And what might article 2(3) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights have to say?
3. Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes:
(a) To ensure that any person whose rights or freedoms as herein recognized are violated shall have an effective remedy, notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity;
(b) To ensure that any person claiming such a remedy shall have his right thereto determined by competent judicial, administrative or legislative authorities, or by any other competent authority provided for by the legal system of the State, and to develop the possibilities of judicial remedy;
(c) To ensure that the competent authorities shall enforce such remedies when granted.
So it may appear as if only one particular section of the covenant is binding upon Canada 3(2), but that single provision affords for all rights presented in the Covenant. I also highlighted ‘official capacity’ because official refers to a service representative acting in an official capacity (the ‘office’ of the Ontario Works, for example). A service representative of government is acting in an official capacity and is equally bound by the covenant, and all of this information is coming directly from the Justice of Canada website.
Furthermore, one of the arguments I presented to Ontario Works (which Christine-Haines Chiarello tried to use to slander Me by stating that I ‘don’t believe the laws apply [to Me]) was that no code, statute or act has the force of law to trespass upon a right (Charter guarantee). This sentiment is very clearly supported by Canada’s department of Justice:
“section 52(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982 provides that a law that is inconsistent with the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.”
Yeah, I know they like to think I am just a crazy Man who believes he’s King, but I am proving to be correct on every point I have made. Do they really think it Will be any different when this Matter is Presented to a Justice?
Basically, what I’m getting at here is that the courts of Canada do very much recognize the covenant as legally binding upon Canada, and One may seek judicial remedy in Canada’s Superior Courts if those rights are violated. I had no Idea that it was actually spoken of specifically in concert with violations upon Canadian Charter rights on the Justice of Canada website, and the Good News here, is that I do not have to look for an international court in Order to receive remedy for the trespasses upon My inherent rights protected by the U.N. Covenant.
Hopefully this Will be a wake up call for service representatives of Canada’s government because it should give them a greater sense of just how incorrect and unreasonable their assertions have been. It is still preferable for Me that they just apologize to Me and stop trespassing upon those rights, but if they insist on maintaining their position, there is remedy in Canada’s courts, and I also discovered they are open for regular filings with reduced hours, from 9:00-11:00 AM and 2:00-4:00 PM.
I plan on preparing at least one lawsuit next month, perhaps two or three (if We include Shoppers and the National Bank of Canada). The only real challenge for Me now appears to be the printing of documents, so I’m hoping that Staples Will be open for business in June. I’ll have more details on My future plans and what lawsuits I Will be focusing on first over the next few days and weeks.
I may start with corporate stuff first and ‘save’ My lawsuits against the government of Canada. The reason for this is that it may be easier for Me to file one suit against the government of Canada listing each of the organizations (Housing Services, Ontario Works, city of Ottawa, etc.) as defendants/respondents. The reason I’m not sure this is the best Way to go is because there are so many government organizations violating Charter rights, I’m not sure I Will even have a comprehensive list; it seems there is always something ‘new’ to add. So for that reason, it may be best to go after each organization independently, and that may also have the effect of establishing precedence that sends a clear message to other government organizations which may prove to be sufficient deterrent against further trespass.
Lots of interesting things coming in the next few weeks and months, I promise You that. Still no Word from any government representatives today or from Shoppers Drug Mart’s legal department. Shoppers Will absolutely be My toughest legal battle, but it Will also be one of the most beneficial for Me for precisely that reason.
I sure hope this Friday finds You feeling Fabulous!
Love and Blessings,