Volume CLXXIV: The Magical Monday Motive A Sean Edition; Corruption in Canada’s Courts and Abdication of Judicial Duty – [Dis]Honourable Justice Sally A. Gomery

Hello every One, and welcome to the Good News Journal, thank King or Queen You for joining Me, I appreciate the Gift of Your Presents. I have a somewhat disappointing Magical Monday Edition for You today, but the Magic of it is that it is My Motive a Sean moving for-Ward (ward=protect-Sean). 😉

Yes, it was an inspired Monday morning and it was a very hot July day. I did some painting this morning and made My Way to the Courthouse this afternoon to Note the defendants in default for a second time. Steven Pardou was once again on the Registrar’s desk. The antics I have been subject to are almost beyond belief if not for the experiences We have already had that were unbelievable enough on their own.

So far, defense counsel has petitioned the Court in violation of Rule 1.09. The ‘Courts’ as an impartial body, did Act appropriately after I also protested the Letter of request, and responded only to Me the next day without notice to defense counsel that the Claim was not ‘frivolous and vexatious’ on its face, and defense could file motion materials with the Court, I Will have fair notice and opportunity to present My own materials opposing the motion. They concluded the email with “No motion materials have been presented to the Court at this time.”

It was very diplomatically stating that defense counsel would be required to file a motion, and I was free to Note the defendants in default if they failed to respond to the Claim within the timeframes provided for in the Rules of Civil Procedures. I was very pleased to hear that and Writ about how thrilled I was to see that Canada’s Courts Honouring the Rules and their obligations (under both the UNCCPR and Canada’s Charter of Rights).

There was some very funny business going on at the Registrar’s desk with Steve Pardou today. Steve was unable to explain to Me why he had knowledge of My Claim before he had looked it up in the system. He was also refusing to accept My Affidavit of Service, even with all of the proof of service delivery to both the city of Ottawa and each of the named defendants who confirm in their [email, printed] reply that the Statement of Claim has been forwarded to their legal counsel Genevieve Langlais. Steve insists this does not prove service delivery, I require a response from Genevieve confirming she has accepted the claim on behalf of the city, despite the fact that a PDF attachment AND Genevieve Langlais email address are cc’d the reply to Me! I was as King to speak with a supervisor and was finally granted the opportunity.

I was as King how filing times can be changed and backlogged on the Court of Record, and why an Affidavit of Service of the Notice of Intent to defend could be accepted without proof of service and that I know they did not produce an Affidavit of Service because Steve had told Me that they filed the Notice with the Court at 10:40:09 on Monday morning. Interestingly enough, when the supervisor investigates all of these details, she tells Me that she is not able to see what time documents are filed on the Court of Record, only dates. I was as King of her how Steve could know if she cannot access that information. I was also as King why I would not be Given Notice of a change to one of My filings, even if it was the result of a delay through the online portal. Why was I not Given Notice immediately, and how is it possible that I should be left in ignorance with respect to what is going on with My claim? Crickets.

She said she regrets to inform Me that she does not have an answer for Me, she is trying to get a printout of all activity on My Case file for Me. I was as King of her if she would be kind enough to email the information to Me when she is able to access it. She agreed that she would, but I was not as King of her for her name because when she returned, she had a decision from the Court to defense counsel’s request to dismiss. The request was endorsed this afternoon by dis-Honourable Justice, Sally A Gomery.

Yes, I say dis-Honourable because here is the determination.

Sometime in the very near future, I Will go over this determination in detail and explain exactly why this determination is not only incorrect, but insulting. My belief is that if People read the actual claim and compare it with the dis-Honourable Justice’s determination, One Will very quickly see that the Justice is doing exactly what defense counsel and housing services have been doing – completely ‘gaslighting’ their obligations legally binding upon Canada. One thing I Will say now, is notice how there is absolutely no mention of Canada’s legal obligations to the UNCCPR? No mention of how the Superior Courts of Ontario have the inherent jurisdiction to provide relief and remedy for violations of Canada’s legally binding obligations for trespass upon One’s inherent rights. Yeah… Because she is abdicating her duties as an officer of the Court to her legally binding international obligations. I am not shy about telling You that is what she is doing, because she is also insulting Me, trespassing upon My rights, and is outright incorrect on many points she makes. This is NOT an impartial decision, this decision was made with extreme bias and prejudice and with complete disregard for all the inherent rights I complain service representatives of Canada’s government have been trespassing upon.

Instead of going through the letter today, I am instead going to Show You how I responded to this determination received by Way of email at 3:13 PM. That Will likely finish out this Post, though I Will close with My summary thoughts.

Monday, July 19th, 2021, 5:05 PM

Subject: CV-21-86803 – ‘No legal basis’?

The Department of Justice of Canada says otherwise.  Under REMEDIES 24(1)

Similar provisions

The Charter contains three provisions that govern the granting of remedies where there is a finding of unconstitutionality. Section 24(1) provides remedies against unconstitutional government action; 

Similar or related provisions are found in the following international instruments binding on Canada: article 2(3) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;

Article 2

3. Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes:

(a) To ensure that any person whose rights or freedoms as herein recognized are violated shall have an effective remedy, notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity;  (service employees, city of Ottawa)

(b) To ensure that any person claiming such a remedy shall have his right thereto determined by competent judicial, administrative or legislative authorities, or by any other competent authority provided for by the legal system of the State, and to develop the possibilities of judicial remedy;

PART I

Article 1

1. All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.

2. All peoples may, for their own ends, freely dispose of their natural wealth and resources without prejudice to any obligations arising out of international economic co-operation, based upon the principle of mutual benefit, and international law. In no case may a people be deprived of its own means of subsistence.

3. The States Parties to the present Covenant, including those having responsibility for the administration of Non-Self-Governing and Trust Territories, shall promote the realization of the right of self-determination, and shall respect that right, in conformity with the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations.

Your decision is a dis-Grace to Canada’s Justice system and an abdication of Your Duty as an Officer of the Court.

But don’t worry, Your determination will be Published on the International Court of Record at www.vondehnvisuals.com

King Sean,

House of von Dehn,

Hand of Stephen,

Kingdom of God

(On Her Majesty’s Service)

And yeah, I had some afterthoughts so there’s more:

Monday, July 19th, 2021, 6:17 PM

Ms. Estabrooks,

I Will NOT allow Your determination to empower housing services to determine My ‘legal status and person’ in society, contrary to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights binding on Canada’s service representatives under threat of economic duress and revocation of My housing subsidy.  You very much DO have a legal and lawful obligation to provide Me with remedy for trespasses upon My inherent rights, and this determination EMPOWERS those who caused Me serious mental and emotional duress to believe it is perfectly fine for the to do so, and that complaining about it is ‘frivolous and vexatious’.
“The government has no right to receive communications from their local government using the particular form of the name they prefer”

Really?  YOU get to determine how My God Given name shall be Spelled?  Where do You obtain that right?  What Gives YOU that right?  A Man can insist he be addressed as SHE and that is within One rights, and refusing to do so is now considered a violation of his/her right, but a Man cannot insist that People Spell his name correctly when addressing him in a formal Letter?  Upon what LEGAL or LAWFUL grounds am I compelled to answer to any other name than that which was Given Me by God?  You didn’t provide that in Your determination.  Nor did You speak to ANY of Canada’s legal binding obligations to the UNCCPR.  You are violating international law and trespassing upon the right of a Canadian People.  Yes, People.
And the Registrar General’s Office and the Ministry of the Attorney General have both acknowledged that I am in fact, King Sean, House of von Dehn, Hand of Stephen, Kingdom of God, and that neither Canada, nor the Registrar’s Office presumes to “Register or hold authority of People.”  I am, in fact, a People.  I am, in FACT, King Sean, House of von Dehn, Hand of Stephen, Kingdom of God, and You are in FACT trespassing upon My right of Self determination and abdicating Your duties as an officer of the Court.

Your determination is a dis-Grace to Canada’s Justice system, I am very disappointed in You.  You Will be added to the Official list of Canada’s People God is officially displeased with.  Enjoy Your new status  on the International Court of Record.

You wonder why I’m offended by VONDEHN, Sean?  von is a prefix, not part of My name.  It means ‘Sir’ in German – You have the right to take that away from Me and make it My ‘last name’.  That Honour was Given My family by the Crown in 1540 Germany.

I also find it offensive because there is no Good reason to use it, as Sean von Dehn is a perfectly Good legal name, and Canada defines ‘LASTNAME, Given’ as a “LEGAL PERSON WITH NO RIGHT OF CITIZENSHIP OR FAMILY”.

You refer to this as the use of “Obscure legal concepts”?  I didn’t make them up, this is how the legal person You Wish for Me to identify with is defined by CANADA!!!  It is INSULTING!  It is also obviously True if Your determination is a reflection of the rights You believe I have (or don’t have).

The Government of Canada’s terminology and linguistic data bank.

A copy of the reply from Canada’s Deputy Registrar General’s office regarding these matters is attached, as well as My Claim of Right to God’s Kingdom, the Holy Temple of Man, Mind, Body, and Soul.  I am NOT a Canadian citizen.

King Sean,
House of von Dehn,
Hand of Stephen,
Kingdom of God,
On Her Majesty’s Service

Cestui Que Vie

The above files were added to the email as attachments ‘proving’ that the Justice is absolutely incorrect! The Registrar has already asserted that the artificial person has NOTHING to do with Me and is not binding upon Me in any Way – so the justice’s determination that Housing Services can address Me as a legal title that has nothing to do with Me is incorrect.

My final summary on this Matter this Magical Monday, is that the government of Canada does know these things to be True, has asserted I am King Sean, House of von Dehn, Hand of Stephen, Kingdom of God, and they know that defense counsel does not have any hope of defending ANY of the statements in My Claim because I have the documentary evidence to prove it, and they don’t Wish for that to come out in Court. The Justice doesn’t even provide a legal or lawful excuse! She completely negates the fact that I was threatened with the economic harm for failing to allow People to address Me in a Way I find offensive to My Character and legal standing. This was a final private pleading from defense counsel behind closed doors in an effort to prevent all of these ‘facts’ from being Presented to a Court because defense counsel has no legal or lawful excuse – and they know it. I’ll bet You any money, defense counsel spent all of her time reaching out to ‘connections’ that would favour her plea, and did not lift one finger in attempt to provide a defense. And she got ‘Lucky’ again. I wonder how many of Canada’s Justices Wish to be known for abdicating their duties to the Court on an International Court of Record? Only time Will tell.

Sad day for Canadian Justice, but a Great day for an investigative, Free Lance Journalist exposing the corruption in Canada’s Courts and the prejudice, bias decisions of Court Justices who Will protect the corporation of Canada and the city of Ottawa before the inherent rights of Canada’s Sovereign People.

Yeah, I can’t say that this was not a momentous disappointment. I thought I was actually going to be able to Show You how Good Canada’s Courts are, and how putting together a proper claim in compliance with the Rules of Civil Procedure could help an individual find remedy for trespasses upon their inherent rights legally binding on Canada. I guess not today.

The Good News is, I know I can’t find remedy in any of Canada’s Courts because this is the right (correct) Court to hear this Claim. It is time to file a Claim into the world’s international Court of Justice, see what they have to say about Canada’s legal obligations and threatening their People with economic duress while Willfully depriving them of their own means of subsistence, even when the legal obligation is made known to them.

Love and Blessings,

P.S. – Rule 24(1) says that remedies will be provided for violations of the UNCCPR binding upon Canada by the competent judicial bodies. Dishonourable Justice Sally A Gomery has just demonstrated she is not a competent judicial body.

1 Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s