Hello every One, and welcome to the Good News Journal, thank King or Queen You for being here, it is a lovely pleasure to have You. For those that don’t know, I am war King on what may be the most important Letter of My Life. I’ve said that a few times over the last year and it has been True in every instance, the ante is just continually raised. I’m preparing a Motion to the Superior Court of Ontario to overturn (vacate) an Order to dismiss My Statement of Claim filed against housing services in June, and to suspend the Judge from any further adjudication over the Matter.
What makes all of this so interesting ‘in fact‘ are what the Judge has Sworn (under penalty of perjury (which is an indictable criminal offence)) to be True. She has asserted on the Court of Record that I am both a King in My Divine Right under God, and a Sworn representative of Her Majesty in My Sovereign State of being. I also filed this Claim “On Her Majesty’s Service” to pay for Court costs (because a King has the right to dispose of His natural wealth to foreign (Canada’s Courts) obligations necessary to fulfill His Duties to God and Her Majesty). Ironically, it was Steve Pardou who insisted on having a copy of My Notice to the Court that I am Acting “On Her Majesty’s Service” to protect the inherent rights of Canada’s People, and that all of My costs are paid for if I am filing against ‘state actors‘. (Link Will take You to the Department of Justice of Canada website where You Will notice that Case Law examples (which are used to defend ‘Common Law’ rights) refer to government employees as ‘state actors’ in a few examples). This is why I say We all have a Role to Play on the world’s Stage.
The Duties of a King to God and Her Majesty are the same as Canada’s own Governor General, which is to ensure that no code, statute or act passed through parliament is Given Royal assent if it trespasses upon the Sovereign rights of Canada’s People. That is literally and Officially (duties and obligations associated with position of Office as Governor General) the most important Duty of Canada’s Governor General. But Canada hasn’t had a Governor General who even knows what the Sovereign rights of Canada’s People are, much less how to intercept bills that may trespass upon them. Best they have is Canada’s Charter (as a guideline).
Canada has also become further corrupted in that the Prime Minister (who basically has no real knowledge of anything and is elected as the result of a popularity contest, rather than a competency examination for the position of Office he is as King of the People hold) appoints a Governor General to the position. One can see how this can very quickly become a conflict of interest, and while most of Canada’s Governor General’s incompetence in the role Will not be as blatantly obvious as the dis-Grace-Full imposter ‘Julie Payette’, the incompetence is perhaps even more damaging because it is the silent kind of harm that allows bills to pass through the House of Commons that slowly erode Canada’s Charter and provide more power to government and corporate lobbyists to pass uncontested bills (cause they’ve got the Governor General in their pocket to pass anything they Wish).
And the People don’t see these things small erosions of their Sovereignty. The government of Canada champions for further independence and separation from the Queen, but Canada has not yet learned how to mint its own coin? Does One not think that is somewhat important? Should Canada’s elected officials not fully comprehend how an economy works and what it is that allows them to borrow money from Her Majesty in the first place? And yes, I say ‘Her Majesty’ because who do You think is behind all the world’s banks? I’ll tell You this, if the coin has Her Majesty’s Seal on it, it is Her Majesty’s coin. Did Jesus not say the same about Caesar and his coin?
“Render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s, and render unto God what is of God.” – Bible, paraphrasing, don’t know where it says that but I know it does! 😛
So on one Hand, I get to read a very disappointing determination made by an Ontario Superior Court Justice. On the other Hand, under penalty of perjury, I quite literally have the Power and the Authority to not only vacate the Order and suspend the Justice, but to have her arrested by the Sheriff’s department for interfering with Justice and defaming the Character of a Governor General to Her Majesty on a Court of Record, which IS an act of High Treason, contempt for the Court, and asserted by the Judge in her determination by presuming every statement in My Claim is a fact.
You can see how this is a bit of a conundrum. Fact is, the Judge probably Wishes to Keep Me out of Court for exactly the same reason. Although it may seem very different because the consequences are so much greater, it is precisely the same Idea and mindset I had when I first discovered that defense counsel had petitioned the Court privately in violation of the Rules (no out of Court communication whatsoever, 1.09). I also petitioned the Court when I learned defense counsel had violated the Rules but I did not mention in My Letter to the Court that I knew it was a violation of the Rules.
That’s the closest I’ve really come to withholding a few of My cards. I thought it might work to My advantage if defense believes I am ignorant of the Rules (they could get careless and make many attempts to capitalize on My ignorance – they did), and if I allow the Court to presume the same, I can more accurately gage how fair they are to self Presented litigants who may not know these things. Remember, I am reporting on these facts for You, the People of the world (and Canada).
The Courts were awesome! I have to say, I have never been more thoroughly impressed with Justice than I was with how the Court chose to handle the situation, because they are empowered to do just about anything if someone breaks the Rules! It might not be a crime to violate the Rules of Civil Procedure, but it does provide the Courts with something of a ‘diplomatic immunity’ to break any other Rule they Wish that is deemed to be ‘in the best interest of preserving Justice and the Matter at Hand’.
I’ve also said before that ‘the Courts’ know I’m legitimately (legally) a King and Acting as a Governor General to Her Majesty. It is the Superior Court of Ontario and Sean Kearney’s office (as legal director for the Ministry of the Attorney General) who receive all of My Notices to the Superior Court. They know because they have copies of all documents I have filed with them on their Records! Just the same as the Courts are not going to hold My Hand and tell Me that defense counsel’s out of Court communication is a violation of the Rules, they simply tell Me that “at this time, no motion materials have been filed”. I know and understand what that means, and they know I Will, too. If it isn’t filed with the Registrar, it doesn’t count, it is not on the Court of Record. So the email Letter used for the determination, is a document I could have objected to if I had been there for the hearing, based exclusively on the determination already made by the Court. No new motion materials were presented, and I don’t believe the emails referenced were ever officially filed with this motion, either. If they were, it Will just be more fraud and perjury by defense counsel that the Court Will have a [filing] Record of. If a legitimate motion to the Court was made, I should have been Given Notice before any paperwork for filing was even started (I have learned this in researching My own Motion filing).
Before I conclude this Post with My still rough but virtually finalized email Letter to Motion the Court, what I Wish to point out here is that I believe the very same principal is True with the whole ‘King thing’. The Courts know the position is real and as legal as it ever could be, but they probably Wonder if I know what kind of Powers that Gives Me in Canada’s Courts. When You consider that I’ve been a King (legally) for a little more than four and a half years now, they are probably beginning to Wonder why I don’t exercise My Power and authority a little more, perhaps they Wonder if I know how. But I don’t doubt for one moment the Courts know what kind of things I can do, and that’s why I’ve been as King of all of You to be patient.
If I were to actually bring charges against Canada’s government, because of the position of Office I hold on paper, it would be very damaging for them in Deed. I try to remain sensitive to the fact that most ‘state actors’ Will be thing King it is a joke or that I am crazy – both work to My advantage.
I Wished to say all of this because it was a rather arduous, thought intensive email to Write because I Wish to point out as many of the gross inaccuracies and falsehoods in the document as possible to Show the Court why the Order must be vacated in the best interest of Justice and Canada’s Courts. At the same time, I really only need to Write:
“By Way of Sally A. Gomery’s endorsement of this requisition to dismiss under Rule 2.01.1 made under penalty of perjury, King Sean, House of von Dehn is hereby Ordering the Court to Vacate the Order, Suspend Justice Sally A. Gomery, and have her removed from the bench for abdication of Her Sworn Oath and Duties as an Officer of the Court. She is also liable to King Sean, House of von Dehn, Hand of Stephen, Kingdom of God in the amount of $2,000,000.00!!! Yes, twenty (20) times she refers to Me as ‘Mr. von Dehn’. Legally, ‘Mr’ von Dehn is VERY different from ‘King Sean’ or ‘Your Excellency’ (which is the proper ‘Style’ of a Governor General’s Official Post). It may seem like a small detail, but it’s like comparing an apple to an orange and saying they are the same. They are not, so that’s twenty counts of fraud and defamation on a Court of Record for a total whopping fine amount of $2,000,000.00. Yes, that’s two million Canadian dollars, just for arbitrarily deciding that $100,000.00 fine would be sufficient to prevent further trespass. I am thing King it Will be when they are Ordered to pay.
Here is the conclusion to My Letter, You can find the first half here, it picks up exactly where I left off in the last Post.
Having said that, I also believe this order must be stricken from the Record because the Judge makes several fraudulent statements regarding the Claim, beginning with the date she claims it was filed, June 21st. This further suggests the Motion was strongly influenced by the Wishes of defense counsel, as she seems to believe she was not served until Monday, the 21st of June – the Court of Record Will Show that Sally A. Gomery’s statement regarding the date of commencement of the Claim is false (perjury). She also mis-spells Sana Abou-Arraj (Abou-Arraf) on at least two occasions, and Christine Amaro (Amero) at least once, while insulting My ‘unusual use of capital letters’ (ad hominem, irrelevant to My arguments, childish behaviour). Yet she Claims to have read the Statement of Claim ‘as generously as possible’? What reason would the Judge have to believe the Claim was filed on Monday if she were reading the Claim from the file in the system? How ‘generous’ is the determination if she does not even take the time to spell the names of the defendants properly? Her errors and lies about My Character and rephrasing statements made in My claim to fit her own fantasy narrative, are acts of perjury and fraud, and they change the entire context of the claim – My unusual use of capital letters does not.
“allegations that “the plaintiff has unilaterally declared himself to have a status that releases him from any obligation to comply with Canadian law” and that, as a result, “any request made to him by a government official is a trespass on him and a violation of his sovereignty“.
Neither one of these assertions are to be found anywhere in My Statement of Claim, they are complete fabrications and outright fraud and perjury. If she cannot quote those two statements from My Claim, she has committed perjury on the Court of Record and it is ‘prima facie’, or self evident on its face. I have never once suggested that I am not obliged to comply with Canadian law, and I am deeply offended by the implications, especially by a Court Judge who is abdicating her legal and lawful duties to the Court by failing to recognize its obligation to provide relief and remedy for Canada’s Charter violations by ‘State Actors’ (as it is expressed on the Department of Justice of Canada website). She has presented false testimony under penalty of perjury that defames My Character!!!
I do not believe an Order can legally or lawfully stand on the Record if it contains fraud and perjury, so I believe the Courts are obliged to Honour My requisition to Vacate this Order and suspend the Judge from further adjudication regarding this Matter. I believe failing to do so with knowledge of these facts is to leave a criminal offence on the Court of Record, and is an abomination upon Canada’s Justice system, the reputation of Canada’s Courts, and perhaps most importantly, the Crown itself.
There are many such instances if One compares the Statement of Claim directly with the determination, but one instance of fraud and perjury in the document is enough to render the document null and void, and these are the statements I find most deeply offensive to My Character. She is Willfully attacking the Good nature of My Character by making clearly false allegations motivated by her own prejudices and imagination. This is both defamation of My Character and further perjury on the Court of Record.
Summary and Conclusion:
I could probably Write another hundred pages if I were to focus only on the reasons this determination must be Vacated and struck from the Record in the name of Justice. Instead, I would like to conclude with the reasons this Statement of Claim should be heard by this Honourable Court.
Canada’s constitution is Founded upon “the belief in the Supremacy of God and the Rule of Law”. A Man’s right to Live a Spiritual Life is the most Sacred right a Man has. To suggest that the Spiritual Man cannot find relief and remedy in Canada’s Court is inconsistent with the very Foundational principle of the Rule of Law itself. Without God, what reason is there for moral Goodness? I am of God, as are My Words and My Sacred Calling (name) under God, and I do Hold the Supreme Claim of Right upon these Gifts.
The Judge implies it is inappropriate for the plaintiff to place the defendants on Notice for their trespass and to advise them he Will fine them $100,000.00 for any future offence, but Will comply without prejudice and under duress for threat of further economic harm (revocation of subsidy). The Judge comments that the plaintiff interpreted their silence and repeat of the offence to be an agreement to his terms. Both legally and lawfully, in any Common Law jurisdiction, it is.
(ii) Civil/administrative remedies
Damages are available in appropriate cases where they would serve a “functional” purpose in remedying a Charter violation. This requires a claimant to demonstrate that damages would further one or more of the general objects of the Charter, including those of section 24(1), namely: compensation (remedying any personal loss the claimant has suffered); vindication (importance of upholding Charter rights); and/or deterrence (of further breaches by state actors) (Ward, supra, at paragraphs 25-31).
This further demonstrates that this is in fact a ‘justifiable claim’, and one that both can and should be heard by any Court of competent jurisdiction, and all Ontario Courts are of competent jurisdiction, it is the ‘default’ jurisdiction of the Ontario Courts.
Section 24(1) does not extend the basic jurisdiction of the courts and tribunals; its applicability depends on a jurisdictional basis external to the Charter itself (Singh v. Canada (Minister of Employment & Immigration),  1 S.C.R. 177 at page 222).
The superior courts of each province have constant and concurrent jurisdiction to hear section 24(1) applications to ensure that there is always a court of competent jurisdiction (Rahey, supra, at pages 603-604; R. v. Mills,  1 S.C.R. 863, at page 956; Weber v. Ontario Hydro,  2 S.C.R. 929, at page 962; Canada (Attorney General) v. McArthur,  3 S.C.R. 626 at paragraph 14). They are the “default” courts of competent jurisdiction (Doucet-Boudreau v. Nova Scotia (Minister of Education),  3 S.C.R. 3 at paragraph 45)
Finally, My Oath of Service to Her Majesty’s Honour is as deep and sincere as My devotion to God, because to Me they are One and the same, “God save the Queen”, “Honour thy Father (God) and Mother (Queen)” – 10 Commandments. I am as King of this Court what decision You believe Will bring the greatest Honour to Her Majesty, Canada’s Superior Courts of Justice as “representatives of the defender of the Faith” (Her Majesty), and the Glory of the Crown?
A name may seem like a small thing to some, but ‘von’ is ‘of’ in German. It is a title of Honour Gifted to a family by the very Crown these Courts represent. For My family, it was Gifted to a forefather sometime around 1540 for his contribution to the People as mayor of a small city in Germany. My father would not let Me allow teachers in grade school to spell ‘von’ incorrectly, or as part of ‘Dehn’, and teachers would never argue with Me – but now, as a full grown Man, government can!? Consider how ridiculous that sounds. And threatening a Man with economic harm for failing to allow his government to address him by what the Judge herself defines as ‘obscure legal concepts’? Her own argument is incongruent because if they are obscure legal terms then why on earth would any One be compelled under threat of harm to allow someone to address them that Way? And again, where does the Foundation for that belief and argument even exist in Law? Seriously. The Judge does NOT legislate laws (and thank God for that), and although she Characterizes Me as having ‘a status that releases him from any obligation to Canadian law” while she openly abdicates her legal and lawful obligations as an Officer of the Court? Does the Judge not understand what a determines a Man’s political status? Does she not understand what a position of office is? Does she not understand that by her own determination, she is outranked and does not have the authority to make this determination because the jurisdiction of the Court is determined by the Matter at Hand. (Singh v. Canada (Minister of Employment & Immigration),  1 S.C.R. 177 at page 222).
If a Judge can fine and jail a Man for failing to address him or her as ‘Your Honour’ in a formal address, how much could a King or Governor General charge for the same, and what does this Court feel is appropriate fine and penalty for the Judge’s trespasses upon Me?As always, (and as stated in My Claim), I do believe this Matter is of great interest to the People of Canada and the International Community, and this Motion and Your reply Will be Published on the International Court of Record at www.vondehnvisuals.com.
I do genuinely believe this order was made in error by Way of impartial testimony made by defense counsel with intent to influence Justice which caused the Judge to make an uninformed determination, and the evidence contained herein supports these facts. To the best of My knowledge, no Motion materials were filed with the Court by defense counsel at any time, only the Notice of Intent to defend. Nothing within Rule 2.01.1(1-6) provides for defense counsel to have any communication outside of the Court without My prior consent or knowledge in violation of Rule 1.09, and the Judge indicates she is responding to a motion after the Court had already expressed to Me “no Motion materials have been filed with the court at this time” on June 25th.
The Judge also indicates the plaintiff had an opportunity to present opposing materials while the Court had communicated to Me very clearly otherwise by Way of the same email – I presumed “no motion materials have been filed with the Court at this time” applied to both parties equally. I do not believe that the Courts would send Me an email with further intent to deceive Me or provide Me with information that is in direct conflict with the statements made by the Judge in her determination if they did not intend for Me to share this information with the Courts. This is clearly a conflict of interest, and information defense counsel knowingly withheld from the Court to influence the Judge unfairly.
It is My Wish that this Honourable Court Will Vacate Sally A. Gomery’s determination and Suspend the Justice from further adjudication regarding this Claim [CV-21-86803) based on the contents of this email and supporting Gifts of evidence I have Presented to You contained within. My Hope is that this Motion Will Move this Honourable Court to take Action.
Please also do be advised that I consider two Matters one and the same. If this Order is not vacated, I Will be filing private, criminal charges against the Judge for her perjury and defamation of My Character on this Court of Record – again, the evidence is black and white. Believe Me, not something I Wish to do, but I Will NOT let a Judge sully the Good nature of My Character with her unsubstantiated lies. If the order is vacated and struck from the Record, then is solves the defamation of My Character and the Act Will be for Given.
A complaint containing the most critical details of this email was also made with Canada’s Justice Council, and I Will be forwarding a copy of this Motion to them with the reference number for the complaint.
It may also be worthy to Note that I actually do know exactly what Canada’s ‘state actors’ must do to provide Me with the relief I am seeking, though I am beginning to believe that the state actors holding positions of Office within Canada’s government with the duty and obligation to do so, are completely ignorant of their duties and obligations to Canada’s People, and don’t have the slightest clue how a Sovereign nation manages its economy, or how to provide a forensic accounting of My estate. (Queen couldn’t very well teach them everything, they might decide to try to separate and claim independence or something crazy and treasonous like that…). I’d very much like to repay My share of Canada’s debt, but I cannot do so until I meet a competent individual within the offices of Canada’s government who can provide a forensic accounting of My estate. And if the Courts don’t comprehend these Words, We’re really in trouble. That also applies to the ‘costs’ of the Court. If resources are an Issue keeping this Matter from being heard, the Court can bill Me directly, it is on the Record that I am Acting on Her Majesty’s Service, My costs are covered to hear this Matter in Service of Her Majesty.
Blessings, and thank ‘King You’ most Sincerely for Your Valuable time and consideration, (because I do legitimately believe We are all Kings and Queens in God’s Kingdom, equal in rights, dignity, and Value).
You Will also Notice that the Order was to dismiss “a statement of claim issued on June 21, 2021”, where the Case File and My original copy of the filing Will Show there IS NO CASE TO DISMISS that was Issued on June 21st, 2021. It is a statement of fraud and perjury (again) for a Judge who claims to have read a Statement of Claim “as generously as possible and assuming all facts are true.” Well, if this is not a statement of perjury, I can have her arrested and fined as a Governor General to Her Majesty, and she is now liable to Me by Way of her own admissions in the amount of, $2,000,000.00 for each instance of ‘Mr. von Dehn’ if this remains on the Record. There is no “Mr.” von Dehn in the Claim, and that position of office is a diminution of legal status with (presumably) intent to offend (20 counts in one determination?). If she believes there is a legal foundation for it, let her know I would like to revisit this Question with her in a Court of competent jurisdiction. If this Judge does not understand what a position of Office is, and how that position is determined, she is incompetent and should not be serving the Crown on the bench for Her Majesty AT ALL!!! We require Judges of competent, concurrent, Jurisdiction.
Thank You again,
Sean von Dehn,
House of von Dehn,
Hand of Stephen,
Kingdom of God,
On Her Majesty’s Service
Alright everyone, thank You so much for joining Me on these adventures and being a Part of My Story. If You have any suggestions or comments (especially on the Motion) please don’t hesitate to let Me know. And yes, I know it’s long and that’s why I did the little ‘disclaimer’ in this Post because it really was very tempting to just very quickly and plainly tell them to Vacate the Order and Suspend the Justice by the Right and Authority afforded to Me by the Judge’s determination made under penalty of perjury.
Love and many Blessings, (I Will be sending this off on “Lucky” Wendesday).