Hello every One, welcome to the Good News Journal, thank King You for being here, welcome to the Simple Solutions Saturday Edition. Today I have a very Special Edition for You because I am expanding on some of the Ideas I was sharing with You in the Free Lance Friday Edition. I was tall King about the recent determination made by Sally A. Gomery and going over some of the information so that I could get My arguments out in preparation of My Motion to the Court to Vacate the order. Well, today I was war King on My Motion and I thought the perfect Post for the Simple Solution Saturday Edition is to just share with You My Letter so far!
Yeah, I figured this might be a Good Idea. I have until 5:00 Thursday to get it done but My Wish was to get a jump start on it early so I can continue to revise, edit, delete and make whatever Magical adjustments I feel I must to Move the Court to take Action. Universal conductor is God, remember. We have to Keep in Tune. My Letter is an ex-Press-Ion, taking Energy from My Will, translating it into the Word, and being received by the reader where that Energy Will (if the Spelling of the Magic is effective) stir emotions (emote-Ions) and perhaps move a Court to take Action (Act-Ions). People try telling Me Words aren’t Magic?!
Dear Madam or Sir,
I suppose before We begin, I should start by letting You know how You can even hear Me before I can Show You what Role I am as King of these Honourable Courts to Play.
Under Rule 2.01(1)(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, it states that “only where and as necessary in the interest of Justice, may set aside a proceeding or a step, document or order in the proceeding in whole or in part.”
The bold italics are Intentional, as is My unusual use of capital Letters. I’ve noticed it is quite common in Law, the Rules are always given a capital. I believe capital Letters are used to bring attention to Words of Importance. This tells Me that the Rules of the Court are Important. My Word is My Will, and My Will was Given Me by God. God always gets a capital. You Will also notice that My unusual use of capital Letters does not change the context of My arguments or their meaning in English.
The Court is provided with the Power to Act under Rule 2.01(1)(b) as a result of the Effects of non-compliance under Rule 2.01(1) and 2.01(1)(a). This is where it gets a little interesting for Me because You already know this! I legitimately believe the Order was a mistake.
Defense counsel petitioned the Court privately and without My prior consent in violation of Rule 1.09. [exhibit 1]
I was not told about this until Thursday, June 24th, at which time defense counsel told Me she had “filed a motion with the Court to dismiss as frivolous and vexatious”. I know petitioning the Court privately is a serious breach of the Rules, and I believe that because I am not a lawyer, defense counsel felt I would perhaps be ‘too stupid’ to know, and that she could take advantage of My ignorance. I did not let her know, I was only as King of her when the Motion was scheduled to take place and when I would have My opportunity to oppose the Motion. She told Me it was already done and that she would share the email with Me so that I can Write the Court, too. I did Write the Court in opposition of her ‘motion’, and again, this is why this feels strange and unusual for Me because the ‘Courts’ already know this.[exhibit 2].
The Courts Will also know that I received a reply to that ‘motion’ [exhibit 3], and it was communicated to Me very diplomatically that “no motion materials have been filed”. The Courts were not entertaining the motion made by defense counsel because it had been made in violation of the Rules. I presumed defense counsel had also received the reply from the Court. She did not. [exhibit 4]
She failed to produce any defense materials and was as King of Me for more time on Monday the 12th, three days after the 20 days provided for by the Rules because she was still waiting for an answer from the Court, and presuming the Court had Honoured her request to not be noted in default. Perhaps I made the mistake of telling her the Court had responded to Me and was not entertaining the request because it was not a properly filed motion.
I noted the defendants in default on Monday afternoon and Mike (Registrar) Will remember Me. When I returned to the Courthouse on Wednesday requesting additional information to book My requisition for default Judgment, I learned the defendants were no longer noted in default and that defense had entered a statement of intent to defend. I was not Given notice and was completely ignorant of what was taking place with My Case file.
A perfectly Good Affidavit of Service was also pulled from My Case file by Steve Pardou, even after being checked and endorsed by two Registrar’s previously, including himself. He continued to refuse acceptance even with proof of email service on all of the defendants, showing an attachment of the Statement of Claim, and confirmed by Way of email that the Statement of Claim had been forwarded to their legal counsel, Genevieve Langlais.
I requested to speak with a supervisor to complain about Steve refusing acceptance of My Affidavit of Service, and the determination from the Judge came in while the supervisor was investigating.
The response is not a reply to the Letter requisition made by email on June 22nd by defense counsel, and I know You (the Courts) know this! This was a new motion to the Court once again made in violation of Rule 1.09. My belief is that the ‘Courts’ were every bit as blindsided by this as I was.
Defense counsel has committed perjury and fraud on the Court of Record with intent to influence Justice and in violation of the Rules of Civil Procedure. She was successful in her fraud, and that is perhaps the most concerning point for both of Us, and why I believe it is in the best interest of Justice, the reputation of Canada’s Courts, and all parties concerned that this document (Order to dismiss by Sally A. Gomery) be stricken from the Record completely. Otherwise, the Judge is also guilty of perjury and fraud on a Court of Record, and that determination was made in ignorance of the facts, influenced by defense counsel’s incomplete and partial ‘motions’ testimony.
Those are the foundational arguments that allow You to hear this Motion in accordance with Rule 2.
This Will, undoubtedly, be one of the most difficult letters I am compelled to Write. Despite the ‘King thing’, I am, in fact, a very modest Man. The only things in this world I claim to hold the Supreme Claim of right upon are My Life (free Will), My God Given name, and My father’s land. These are all part of My rightful inheritance under God in any Common Law jurisdiction, and no Man on this earth has any right of trespass upon My real estate. That very much includes the Sacred calling of My name Given Me by God, and the position of Office I choose (free-Will) to Hold as a King and rightful Heir to God’s Kingdom.
“Hallowed be My name” – Cestui Que Vie, Lord’s Prayer
I am a Spiritual Man, and I have Claimed a Spiritual, non-commercial Life. I clearly know and understand the difference between the Living Man and the artificial juridical person Created by the State. That is precisely why King Sean, House of von Dehn, Hand of Stephen, Kingdom of God is the legal and lawful private attorney for the artificial legal person, and why I insist that the expression of that artificial legal person Will only be expressed in the Style of capitus diminutio minimus, or ‘Sean von Dehn’.
I know only too well that a Living Man cannot exist on paper and must be expressed as a legal entity. I also know and understand that ‘Sean von Dehn’ is a perfectly Good legal and lawful entity, known as the ‘natural person’, or ‘private person’ in Law. I am a ‘natural person’ in Law.
Perhaps I should have articulated these concepts more clearly in My Statement of Claim, though My presumption was that those Trusted to Act as Magistrates of Canada’s Courts would know and comprehend these concepts well enough it should not be necessary.
What is more troubling for both of Us if this order remains on the Record, is that if We accept the Order made under penalty of perjury to be fact, then the Judge has asserted the following facts under penalty of perjury:
59. The plaintiff, Sean von Dehn, has Sworn allegiance to God and the Queen (in that Order).
60. A Man who Swears an Oath of allegiance to God is Holding a position of Office as King in God’s Kingdom, the Holy Temple of Man’s Mind, Body and Soul.
61. A Man who Swears an Oath to Serve God and the Queen in a constitutional democratic Monarchy is also Holding a position of office as Governor General to Her Majesty in his Sovereign state of being.
62. A trespass upon a King or a Governor General to Her Majesty in a constitutional democratic Monarchy is an Act of High Treason.
The Judge acknowledges that I am a Spiritual Man Holding a position of Office as Governor General to Her Majesty, and a King in My own [Divine/God Given] right, and continues to assert under penalty of perjury that:
32. The defendants have demonstrated intent and Willful determination to offend, antagonize, and to diminish the plaintiff Sean von Dehn’s legal status in Law.
63. Sean Stephen von Dehn is continually deprived of his own means of subsistence by the city of Ottawa.
73. Trespass upon a Man’s right to freely dispose of his natural wealth without prejudice to foreign (Canada/city of Ottawa) obligations, is to hold a Man in bondage and servitude to the state.
And while the Judge attempts to characterize My complaint of trespass upon My international rights as ‘unparticularized’, I very clearly indicate the two rights binding upon Canada in accordance with the UNCCPR I Wish to freely enjoy:
56. It is well known by the defendants that Sean is as King of them to Honour their international obligations to him under the United Nations Covenant on Civil and Political Rights binding upon Canada, and in particular,
- Article 1(1) All People have the right of Self determination. By virtue of that right, they freely determine their political status, and freely pursue their economic, social, and cultural development, and
- (2) All People may, for their own ends, freely dispose of their natural wealth without prejudice to any obligations arising out of international economic cooperation based on the principal of mutual benefit, and international Law. In no case may a People be deprived of its own means of subsistence.
The Ontario Superior Court has the Power and Authority to hear this Matter because it is a Court of competent jurisdiction, as determined by Canada’s Department of Justice. Rule 24(1) provides the Ontario Superior Court with the Power to provide relief and remedy for trespasses upon Charter rights, and Canada’s international obligations binding upon Canada.
A trespass upon a right is a form of harm (tort), and is the cause of a justifiable action. If it is clear there has been a violation of One’s rights, or that harm has been done, Rule 2.01.1 does not apply. The Courts have a duty and a responsibility to provide relief and remedy where it is clear that harm has been done. The Judge does not deny that harm has been done, or that trespasses upon My inherent rights have taken place.
By Way of her own determination, the Justice has trespassed upon My inherent rights just by referring to Me in her determination as ‘Mr.’ von Dehn. Mister or Master is a distinctly different position of office to that which a King or Governor General is holding, and the Style of address is also distinctly different. By Way of her own testimony and under penalty of perjury, the Judge has abdicated her duties and responsibilities as an Officer of Canada’s Court and has committed high treason by Way of her own convictions and assertions made in her determination.
I Trust We can both see why it is in the best interest of Justice, the Courts, and the Judge who made this determination to have this order stricken from the Record. I Trust the Court Will determine appropriate action for the false testimony and perjury of defense counsel regarding this Matter, and why it Will be appropriate to suspend the Justice from any further determinations regarding this Matter for conflict of interest.
As I do believe this determination was made in error and without all the facts, I am going to for Give Sally A. Gomery as I believe she was unfairly influenced to make this determination, and I Will also remove her name from the international public record of elected officials God is officially displeased with, and she may continue to Hold her position of Office in Honour.
(Still a war King progress) 😉
Alright People, I am thing King that is it for today but that’s close to the final product, though I Will be reviewing, editing and adding a more cohesive conclusion as I get closer to the day I officially file it.
One of the reasons I am Posting this here is also to Give the Courts the opportunity to look into this as much as they Wish before I file and Give them a sense of what is ‘coming down the pipes’, so to speak. The more informed they are before they receive the actual motion, the more likely I figure they are to Act on it quickly. And ironically, People, I am actually thing King they are a little anxious for it! I could be Way off, but that is what My intuition is telling Me. I am thing King the Courts Wish to do the right thing, they just need a bit of a push to put things in Motion.
Love and Blessings, beautiful People!!!
Oh, One last request. Remember how We were as King of God for an Honest Court? Well, Our Wish was Granted, so let Us Keep on as King. In the name of God, I am as King for the Courts to be moved by this Motion.